Go  |
New |
Find |
Notify |
|
Reply |
|
Admin |
New PM! |
Registered: March 09, 2004
Posts: 2913
|
1. People who can't support their statements with legit sources. 2. Also people who blatantly lie. (see number 1.) I say this because, some things said can cause bodily harm and missunderstanding.
|
Registered: November 30, 2004
Posts: 4514
|
My apologies.
"I Dream away everyday, Try so hard to disregard The rhythm of t he rain that drops, And coincides with the beating of my heart"
|
Registered: July 26, 2004
Posts: 2891
|
And blown.
Evitere Les Contrefacons.
|
Registered: June 02, 2004
Posts: 8352
|
This is all futile...
Live and Let Live. Love and Let Love.
|
Registered: April 03, 2004
Posts: 6560
|
Yes, I agree. I believe Jamaica should be permanently banned. Her pet names are very irritating.
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
|
Registered: March 09, 2004
Posts: 2913
|
quote: Originally posted by jamaica17:
That is it?? You want to ban people who can't support their statements and stuff?
What about druggies? I think THEY should be banned. It is OK if you can't support your statements, but somehow, druggies SHOULD be banned.
YES I WANT LIARS BANNED. it is NOT ok if you cant back up your statements, this is why jamiaica would be a horrible lawyer. why do you think no one is doing what youre saying. How are you suppose to convert us to good if you cant show us proof what youre saying is right.
|
Registered: March 09, 2004
Posts: 2913
|
See the thing that pisses me off is, someone will say drugs are bad for you, which is saying pot, mushrooms, and peyote is just as bad for you as speed. Yet they cannot back up their statement with a factual source such as a medical journal. Instead I get "look it up yourself!" .. believe me I have looked it up myself and I know the answer and its not what you said. I know if I posted the source, you will not even look at it. Thats why I want YOU to show me a source to prove you took the time to actually prove your point and actually research what youre trying to say. If you cannot do this simple thing, you cannot be trusted with what you say. Blind faith does not work in this situation. Another example is if you have sex with someone who is not a virgin you will get AIDS. You are using scare tactics to influence the people who read these posts. This is wrong, maybe you should take the time and research and post the statstics of getting HIV. I already have and if you live in the US, there is a .003% chance you will contract it. All I ask for is some evidence to support ideas, its not hard to do. Using scare tactics actually does the exact opposite of what youre trying to do. Someone will have sex with a non virgin, and see hey I didn't get aids, so now they are having sex with everyone and everything, this will lead to stds. Or they'll smoke some pot and figure out its not really that bad for them, so that means the person who told them about it is lying about all drugs as well. Now that kid is gonna be using coke and heroin thinking they were lied to about that as well.
|
Registered: February 18, 2004
Posts: 3177
|
Can we ban the people who can't spell or puncuate too? Getting annoyed with trying to unsuccessfully translate some of these threads. And I'll agree with bauhaus too.
Hope for the best and expect the worst............take whatever life throws at you...
|
Registered: June 22, 2004
Posts: 2345
|
I understand where bauhaus is coming from. Why would you want to listen to people who lie and can't back up what they are saying with legit facts and statements? Just put yourself in that position.
I have not yet reached my goal, and I am not perfect. But Christ has taken hold of me. So I keep on running and struggling to take hold of the prize. My friends, I don't feel that I have already arrived. But I forget what is behind, and I struggle for wha
|
|
Registered: June 28, 2003
Posts: 2745
|
quote: Why should druggies be banned? Why are they any less fit to be on YN? I don't want to argue, just please answer the question.
because that is a bigger reason to be banned rather than bauhaus' reasons such as:1. People who can't support their statements with legit sources. 2. Also people who blatantly lie. (see number 1.) quote: Aha! According to bauhaus' plan, jamaica should be banned because she didn't (or perhaps couldn't) back up her "ban the druggies" statement with a source or even a reason.
that is not what I meant, sweetie  |
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6058
|
Aha! According to bauhaus' plan, jamaica should be banned because she didn't (or perhaps couldn't) back up her "ban the druggies" statement with a source or even a reason.
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|
Registered: February 02, 2004
Posts: 9214
|
Why should druggies be banned? Why are they any less fit to be on YN? I don't want to argue, just please answer the question. "You learn about equality in the classroom but you find out about it in life" - Campus Confidential www.myspace.com/yogore |
|
Registered: June 28, 2003
Posts: 2745
|
quote: Well I think stupid people should die but that doesn't mean it will happen.
whatever... no one should die... many people die out of carelessness or violence and stuff. |
Registered: December 11, 2003
Posts: 9501
|
Well I think stupid people should die but that doesn't mean it will happen.
"Regardless, I have always, and will always, succeed."
|
|
Registered: June 28, 2003
Posts: 2745
|
quote: 1. People who can't support their statements with legit sources.
2. Also people who blatantly lie. (see number 1.)
That is it?? You want to ban people who can't support their statements and stuff? What about druggies? I think THEY should be banned. It is OK if you can't support your statements, but somehow, druggies SHOULD be banned. |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
