with the vast funding of totalitarian regimes such as the former dictatorship of which country(s)?

quote:

---

yes we need to get them before they get us!

---

And do tell, by what means are they going to get us?

WJ, I don't know why, but I missed you on YN.

the reason we sided with iraq in the 80s was to get to iran they harbor terrorists my stepdads internet friend from tehran was part of student uprising and said that at his college the halls were splattered with blood if you speak against the gov. there you die! yes we need to get them before they get us!

it will be worth it. But it will take longer with the government stifling technology. It is so sad

it wil take a while to develop ways to harness hydrogen power.

quote:

---

Nah, oil is too much of a $$$ producer

---

The sad thing is that, if ethenol or hydrogen power, which is cheaper and more enviornmentatlly safe, were cropped, then the farmers would not have to be paid to not cultivate their land, and they could regain their dignity.

quote:

---

Ah, that I didn't know.

---

The only problems are:
A.) Luissiana as a state is sinking under the Gulf of Mexico because of oil drilling-karma
B.) the american indians own the oil territory in Califorinia.

quote:

---

Yes, but there is oil off the coast of California and in the delta of the Mississippi River.

---

Ah, that I didn't know.

quote:

---

Hydrogen and Ethenol may be the future, but I doubt it.

---

Nah, oil is too much of a $$$ producer.

Yes, but there is oil off the coast of California and in the delta of the Mississippi River.

Hydrogen and Ethenol may be the future, but I doubt it.

But, since it isn't much, you will HAVE to eventually get oil from Siberia.

there is an estimated thirty billion barrels of oil up there.
even if there isnt that much, there is oil up there.

You're not even sure there is oil in Alaska. WHile back in SIberia, the factories and crap are starting up...

whcih maybe the reason why we arent and will never get oil from Russia. we wil get ifrom Alaska if it is of any new place.

a lot

No, I don't even slightly think you're right.

Of course Bush wouldn't push for Siberian oil. Don't you realize how much *** you'll have to lick to get a decent price for Russian oil?

i ded read what you said. but i know im right. Bush is pushing for driling in te Arctic National Wildlife Refuge least thats what i think it stands for.
ive heard nothing of Russia.

Wrong. Read.

"Get a map of Russia. Then, go to the upper-right area. Siberia! _They_ are estimated to be your next oil suppliers! They, in a few years, will have more oil than Saudi Arabia! And the $$$ is being invested there too for better technology in the oil-gaining process..."

if we are to have any other oil suppliers it will be ANWR in Alska. not Russia.

quote:

---

Get a map of Russia. Then, go to the upper-right area. Siberia! They are estimated to be your next oil suppliers! They, in a few years, will have more oil than Saudi Arabia! And the $$$ is being invested there too for better technology in the oil-gaining process...

---

Yes, my country holds the future oil supplier.

My country will sell the oil at very expensive prices, thus you pay even more than you currently are.

I will not negotiate with anyone to lower the prices.

quote:

---

Iraq and Kuwait alone sit on 40% of the earth's oil and i believe that Saudi Arabia is the biggest holder of oil. dont know how much they hold individually.

---

Get a map of Russia. Then, go to the upper-right area. Siberia! They are estimated to be your next oil suppliers! They, in a few years, will have more oil than Saudi Arabia! And the $$$ is being invested there too for better technology in the oil-gaining process...

quote:

---

waht are you talking about? its only a matter of time before we have osama.

---

Yes, he weekly sends a tape, yet 3 years later...