He wasn't a geek, though. When the Turks invaded his nation of Walakia, he massacred all the people in his capital and burned it to the ground, putting the dead on spikes. Suliman the Conquerer said "What can one do against such men" and left with his army. I think Dracula got an award from the pope for repulsing the turks.
O of where dost thou hail, Celephanil, Celephanil? Why dost thou wander in Tengelwar great, why on the sea do you sail?
No one cries, 'They won't return.' No one lays a lily on their grave. The good man scorns the wicked. Through their lives our children learn..what we miss when we misbehave...
And goodness knows, the wickeds' lives are lonely. Goodness knows the wicked die alone. It just shows when you're wicked you're left only...on your own...
Originally posted by Sho: No one mourns the wicked...
No one cries, 'They won't return.' No one lays a lily on their grave. The good man scorns the wicked. Through their lives our children learn..what we miss when we misbehave...
And goodness knows, the wickeds' lives are lonely. Goodness knows the wicked die alone. It just shows when you're wicked you're left only...on your own...
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Thats true all our Heros are bad guys from a certain perspective and the most evil of bad guys are Heros to some
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Lol, he was a conqueror. Bad or good doesn't apply, because it always depends on the perspective.
"A man's called a traitor, or liberator. A rich man is a thief, or philanthropist. Is one a crusader, or ruthless invader? It's all in which label he's able to persist. There are precious few at ease with moral ambiguities, so we act as though they don't exist!"
Ghengis wasn't a bad huy he was very cultred okay there was the "made a pile of human skulls" thing but every one did that back then really it was psychologocal warfare now if he did that because it made him feel "happy" then he'd be sick and twisted
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
i would have to say that(and my spelling may be a little wrong) ghengas khan jeffery dohmer hannibal lector(although he was a genius) were all extremely sick individuals
General MacArthur tops my list, as well. Brilliant general..but a little too damn cocky.
Brillant my ass he was an idiot and very, very cocky, he was also a pathological liar
"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Topics 
