YN Home  
Causes Blogs Play City Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
 
YouthNoise Home Page    Topics    Youth Speak Out | Chat | Activism  Hop To Forum Categories  HISTORY  Hop To Forums  Pre-History/Ancient History    BCE/CE replaces BC/AD?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of Bushsupporter
Registered: September 19, 2001
Posts: 2202
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Christ existed. It is a fact. If you don't like it, go and cry. BC doesn't mean "before Christ, the savior and son of God, who died for our sins so that we may be worthy of the perfection of God." It just means Before Christ. Why does this have to be such a big deal to people? I don't get it. BC and AD have as much religious meaning nowadays that the Red Cross has.


"Freedom is not Free"-Korean War Memorial, Washington DC.
Picture of Euterpe
Registered: September 29, 2004
Posts: 3690
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Your teachers are clearly not that bright.


A lo hecho, pecho.
Picture of AutumnRomance
Registered: October 30, 2005
Posts: 130
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Every time I use B.C.E/C.E., my teachers mark it wrong.


"Security gives way to conspiracy."
Picture of DrStrangelove
Registered: March 13, 2002
Posts: 3477
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by ampmaster:
Mya is geologic time I belive that starts with the farthest the georecord goes (a good 2 bill years or so) and moves forward from there, at least I think


Ha, well you're right it's geologic time but you've got it backwards. Mya stands for Millions of Years Ago. That means that each year makes the next one year older. In reality it's totally impractical for everyday use, ha.


"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"
Picture of ampmaster
Registered: February 22, 2004
Posts: 13983
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Mya is geologic time I belive that starts with the farthest the georecord goes (a good 2 bill years or so) and moves forward from there, at least I think


"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Picture of toughshorty
Registered: February 10, 2006
Posts: 1881
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
what the crap are you talking about Dr? What's Mya?


MN debater, AIM me, I'm probably on and I'm probably bored... toughgirldb8r
Picture of DrStrangelove
Registered: March 13, 2002
Posts: 3477
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
As a geologist, I think we should just throw this whole BC/AD or BCE/CE thing out the window, and go for my favorite: Mya. One number. Works great.


"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"
Picture of ChaosSplintered
Registered: August 05, 2006
Posts: 360
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
All the reports I've written have been BCE/CE, so that's what I've grown accustomed too. I don't personally have any die hard preferences as to which one would be preferable, so BC/AD works for me as well.

Really, I think BCE/CE might as well go through, purely on the fact that it sounds cool. Arbitrary? Yep, and that's the way I like it. It's new, and I'd prefer being able to say BCE and CE, because it sounds like something I'd read out of an Isaac Asimov story. So, might as well get CE.

Or we can stay with BC, AD. Oh well. AD is personally boring in my opinion, but that's just my opinion. Once again, completely arbitrary, but when wasn't an opinion arbitrary?

Really, I'll stick to my BCE/CE until they force me not to use it anymore.


Cheated the way from fringe to elite. Clique of stylists, rounded illogic skipping a beat to a dead cert. By lheaving charges and bursting the abscess, with a forked toungue, bloated with courage and spewing self-importance. Drop your sights, aim lower, leave umblemished those with real power.
Picture of toughshorty
Registered: February 10, 2006
Posts: 1881
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
BC does stand for something in latin, I don't remember what... it doesn't stand for before christ tho. And it isn't at jesus's birth. he was born about 4 or 5 years after that date if I remember correctly. Really they are just a random date that ppl decided worked.


MN debater, AIM me, I'm probably on and I'm probably bored... toughgirldb8r
Picture of Meagan87
Registered: May 07, 2003
Posts: 7624
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Even if everyone does switch to "BCE" and "CE"...the dates will still revolve around Jesus's birth.

Even if we change the words, the meaning behind them is still there...

Thus, it really doesn't matter what names we use for the time periods...and for me BC and AD are easier.


"Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has." --Margaret Mead
Picture of ampmaster
Registered: February 22, 2004
Posts: 13983
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
nope and neither do people in say india they (the buddhist population any way) base their calander on the year of buddhas death.


"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Picture of Holliewood
Registered: February 26, 2002
Posts: 976
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Well, do Polynesian islanders use it?


"The story of my life. I always get the fuzzy end of the lollipop."
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6100
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
But why use it when it isn't accurate? I'm sure Polynesian islanders don't care when Jesus was born, and I doubt they would ever measure time based off the alleged date of his birth.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of Knighthammer
Registered: August 09, 2006
Posts: 1074
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
i dont care people are used to the current way and will still use it anyway.


The original draft of The Lord of the Rings featured Chuck Norris instead of Frodo Baggins. It was only 5 pages long, as Chuck roundhouse-kicked Sauron's ass halfway through the first chapter.
Picture of Brehon
Registered: January 22, 2005
Posts: 860
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Over here in England the text books still say BC and AD, and it's still the one that you hear in conversation, but the teachers all use BCE and CE. It makes more sense to use BCE and CE really.


'I consider that there is nothing better or more enjoyable than life itself. It is not therefore to be wondered at if I am willing to purchase my life with my material possessions.' Geoffrey of Monmouth
Picture of Holliewood
Registered: February 26, 2002
Posts: 976
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Well, the use of BC and AD is a part of history. Jesus is being used as a historical figure in order to calculate what year it is. We have been basing our year around the time of Jesus' existence. Its been used for many, many years. People should just get over it.


"The story of my life. I always get the fuzzy end of the lollipop."
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6100
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It's not being politically correct. It's being historically accurate, although a bit biased towards Western civilization.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of Kate127
Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 3802
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Being politicaly correct is far too much effort. Largely because what is politicaly correct always seems to be changing.


It must be lovely to wake up in the morning and understand everything.
Picture of Greenleaf771
Registered: March 30, 2005
Posts: 3628
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Personally, I use BCE and CE. Apparently, it's favored by American archaeologists and historians. *shrugs* It's been around for a while. I used it four years ago during a state social studies fair actually, and it wasn't new then. . . BCE can also stand for "Before the Common Era" or "Before Christian Era" (I think the "christian" one is less common. . .) and CE for "Common Era" or "Christian Era" (again, christian less common. . .) That's what I've always used. "Common Era" that is.


"I imagine a lot of people tune in simply to watch reporters get bitch-slapped by Mother Nature, and frankly, who can blame them?� Anderson Cooper
Picture of Holliewood
Registered: February 26, 2002
Posts: 976
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Yeah, AD stands for Anno Domini, which is latin for "in the year of the Lord."

And I don't know about anyone else, but I already thought BCE and CE was old news. We've been using it in school since I was in 10th grade I think. This is all I see now, I rarely ever see BC and AD used anymore.


"The story of my life. I always get the fuzzy end of the lollipop."
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3  
 

YouthNoise Home Page    Topics    Youth Speak Out | Chat | Activism  Hop To Forum Categories  HISTORY  Hop To Forums  Pre-History/Ancient History    BCE/CE replaces BC/AD?