Agreed WorthWaitingFor. But you see, females were built to give birth to children, and males were built to temporally provide for their children. See what I mean?

This isn't to say that I've not got plans other than to become a mother. Heck no. In fact, I've wrote my life plan the other day.

First I shall go to college, double major in linguistics and disabled communications (different forms of SL, Braille, etc.). I'll minor in music.

At some point in time, I will publish at least some of my writing.

I will get married, and maybe serve a mission.

Then I will proceed to trace all language back to one base. (We have to start with the far goals. "Alice in Wonderland": (misquoted)

"'Which way should I go?'

'That all depends on where you want to get.'

'I really don't much care.'

'Then it really doesn't matter which way you go.'"


I am going to find some way to translate the idea of music to the deaf (thus the music minor, plus I just love music), and if I achieve all that, I'll find some way to translate color to the blind.

I have plans. But I want children too.

Well that makes sense, I guess. And yeah, childbirthing (so unfair you guys got out of both that and the menstrual cycle...all you have to do is the sex part).

I still think women can do those things just on a smaller scale. No hunting huge game, for example, and...I have no idea what chick would want to be a lumberjack.

Well, as we all know, having children.


However, past that:

Male bone structure is denser. That's scientific fact. Male eyelashes are longer. Scientific fact. Males have less fat percentage. Scientific fact. Males have higher muscle density. Scientific fact. All these things were to design the male body for doing the stuff such as hunting, lumberjacking, etc.

quote:

One thing that also bothers me about the feminists is that they don't recognize gender roles. There are things that male bodies were designed for, and things that female bodies were designed for, and we don't want to cross the line.

I guess I would be considered a bit of a feminist then because I just don't think I agree with that. Give me an example of a role that you don't think a woman's body was designed for and I'll see if I agree or disagree?

Have you ever seen the Life Of Brian, by Monty Python...

In the movie they have a great example, there's a guy who wants to be a woman, (this is in the time of the roman empire) and he demands the right to have children, even though he cant give birth to a child, he wants the right to have one... and that seems to be where feminism is going.

If that's the way it is, I'm all for the feminists, however, the feminist groups in my area are all feminazi, so I have my problems with the feminist groups.

Though, as most know, I still am all for stay-at-home mothers, and feminine pulchritude and the like, I still would like that women had the exact same rights as men. I'm all for Susan B. Anthony, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Amelia Earhart, and all those women who did great things to prove that neither man nor woman is better, but I think that their goal has been acheived, and we don't need the feminist groups and women unite things anymore.

One thing that also bothers me about the feminists is that they don't recognize gender roles. There are things that male bodies were designed for, and things that female bodies were designed for, and we don't want to cross the line.

Well she's not going to be in the military much longer... I think that her next performance may be attended by a few superiors and some cops.

That's not a feminazi. That's worse. That's just like we call here a parabicho, the type of woman who just wants to do anything to benefit herself.