Registered: September 19, 2001
Posts: 2202
|
First of all, there are plenty of athiests and non-christians who are against gay-marriage. Second, Bush can't "ban gay marriage." Grow up and read the constitution. Third, I am on the fence here. I disagree with gay mariage but I also agree with Celtic that this issue should be left to the states. I would not be against a Federal Amendment, but I would rather the states do it themselves.
"Freedom is not Free"-Korean War Memorial, Washington DC.
|
Registered: June 14, 2004
Posts: 2739
|
No. Especially since his reasons have to do with his Christianity. That would almost be like him forcing his religion on all of America. And I agree with moovivor....I'll be begging to move as well.
Belief makes things real/Makes things feel, feel alright/Belief makes things true/Things like you, you and I
|
Registered: December 11, 2003
Posts: 9501
|
No, it's none of his business. Leave it to the states to choose.
"Regardless, I have always, and will always, succeed."
|
Registered: April 24, 2003
Posts: 2196
|
You can't ban something if it's not legal to begin with. I know in some places it is, but it's not like it's a national thing.
"Victories that are easy are cheap. Those only that are worth having are the ones which come as the result of hard fighting"-Henry Ward Beecher
|
Registered: November 20, 2004
Posts: 277
|
Bush himself? No. And he can't.
But, if a constitutional amendment passes (MANY, MANY people have to agree with an amendment for it to pass) against it, then... I guess the country will have spoken. But if that does happen (and on a national scale, it's highly improbable), I can honestly say I will beg my parents to move to Australia (lovely place) or Canada (that's where my friends will be moving).
|
Topics 
