YN Home  
Home Causes Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
Search YN:
 
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
“Yeah. I know. That's why I say we didn't sacrifice anything to go to war. We were/are a huge (and rich) country with unlimited resources and an ocean separating us from the fighting. A few thousand lives is nothing in a war. “

you are saying that those people died for nothing? We do not have unlimited resources. We are people just like the rest of the world.

”Millions of Europeans dying, from countries of much smaller populations; (not to mention the fighting was on their land); means that they sacrificed a lot more.”

I’m sure they did sacrifice more lives. But most of them were innocent civilians, like the 6 million Jew annihilation. They were defenseless. there was no way for them to defend themselves. Im not saying they didn’t sacrifice more lives. I’m saying that we liberated Europe. Of course the fighting is going to be on their land. Germany is over there. If Mexico ended up being an evil dictator and wanted to take over the US, there would be fighting here, I don’t understand what point you are trying to make.

”And yeah, you're racist for hating the French. Because you clearly hate them, not their stance in this one situation, just like all the other idiots doing stupid anti-France crap. It's a funny thing, but there is a definite anti-France group of people in the United States that hate the French just because they're French, no matter what they do. There are a ton of stereotypes about them. But anyone who actually knows anything about the French knows they aren't true. Damn. It pisses me off.”

Hey the French are Caucasian im Caucasian how does that work out? How can I be racist? That like saying that Bill Cosby was racist for saying what he did. Did I say I was part of any anti French group? No so what the hell is your point in bringing that up?

”HERE IS WHY I CALL YOU A RACIST. You, and many others like you, are blowing this thing way out of proportion BECAUSE it is the French who are opposing us. If it was anyone else, you anti-France morons wouldn't be throwing such a ****fit about it. “

God dammit! read my posts we aren’t asking them to go to war! They were such an advocate for peace before, and now they wont help us with a peace mission! What the hell is with that? It ultimately comes down to that the French hate us for taking out Saddam because they had illegal oil operations going on in Iraq. So if the French hate us their racist? You never answered my question before. Since the entire world hates us, is the entire world racist? No its because they dislike our actions there is nothing racist in that. For crying out loud! You yell at the coalition for jumping on peoples cases about racism. Look at yourself you hypocrite.

”They aren't supporting us in invading Iraq. So you respond by bringing up old conflicts, stereotypes, re-naming freaking french fries, and in general behaving like a angry three year old. That's racist. And yes, their economy was severely hurt by their stance against us. Why? Because Americans stopped buying French products, even though it had nothing to do with the Invading Iraq conflict.”

What the hell is your problem? Do you not have the intelligence of at least a bird? We aren’t asking them to invade Iraq! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! PEACE MISSION! Did that get past your skull?

”Ugh. It's just stupid.

Also; so many people come on here all the time "God Bless America! Go Army! Screw Everyone Else! President Bush is God incarnate! France sucks! Christianity and homophobes live on!" I swear, there are a ton of you that have all those stances mashed into one! So in a way I had an idea of why you hated the French even before you explained yourself. Go ahead and cry stereotypes, it's not the same. And I still think I was right, even if you don't want to admit it.”

Hey un- American (ICELAND) go move out to Iceland. We don’t need anymore of your incoherence here.

This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
Picture of ICELAND
Registered: July 28, 2003
Posts: 2838
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
-----"""Well, in that case, there is little argument to oppose the war in Iraq."""

...

Idiot. Just because we CAN go to war doesn't mean we should.
Picture of NuShoesAgain
Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Maxno wrote:
quote:
he Nazis did not plan for the extermination of the French, they viwed them as inferior, but not as inferior as Slavs and Jews, whose inferioritiy warrented extermination.


Where did you get this idea from?

Hitler was a die-hard occultist, who was convinced that everyone "imperfect" should be eliminated. He was convinced that Germans were the only pure Aryans, and that others tainting Germany and everywhere else should be eliminated. His hatred was particularly directed at Jews, but not exclusively. Hitler was nuts, to be sure.

quote:
The French would have been subjugated according to the Nazi plan. And the Russians would have beat the Nazis anyway. Maybe the French would be speaking Russian?


The French would likely have been exterminated for the occultist reaosns alone, not to mention that Hitler would have wanted to eliminate any resistance. He had a track record of slaughtering peoples he didn't like for whatever the reason. He also had a hatred of Slavs, so he wasn't fond of the Soviets. And the Soviets barely survived against him. The Russians had inferior weaponry to the Germans, who had weapons like the Stuka which wiped out companies of tanks at a time. The Soviets lost 20 million men and 2/3rd of their industry to German soldiers.

Hilter had ordered that his troops kill "all potential leaders of society, all communists, Jews, Gypsies, guerrillas, saboteurs and those capable of resistance." While meant specifically for the Russians, he also applied this tactic to everyone who got in his way. The French wouldn't have stood a chance.
Picture of NuShoesAgain
Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Yeah. I know. That's why I say we didn't sacrifice anything to go to war. We were/are a huge (and rich) country with unlimited resources and an ocean separating us from the fighting. A few thousand lives is nothing in a war


Well, in that case, there is little argument to oppose the war in Iraq.

But the U.S. sacrificed an enormous number of our people and resources to fight WWII. 400,000 is not just "a few thousand lives." And even a few let alone a few thousand are not to be taken lightly.
Picture of NuShoesAgain
Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
And ultimately yourselves! America was not protected from Hitler! You didn't know who we was going to declare war on next!


Although Hitler had considered plans to attack America, he didn't have the tools to do it. Germany didn't even have a long-range bomber that could make it here and back. I have heard some things about Hitler supposedly wanting to attack NewYork, but that would at best have a psychological effect. Also, tactically, it would be pretty close to impossible for Hitler to have taken on the U.S., considering that we're armed to the teeth and we're a big country. Hitler was able to field as many troops as he was because Germany is a part of the Eurasian continent. But do you know how many ships and planes, not to mention how much time, it would take to land even a few hundred thousand troops?
Picture of ICELAND
Registered: July 28, 2003
Posts: 2838
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
-----"""We lost thousands of American lives on D-Day."""

Yeah. I know. That's why I say we didn't sacrifice anything to go to war. We were/are a huge (and rich) country with unlimited resources and an ocean separating us from the fighting. A few thousand lives is nothing in a war.

Millions of Europeans dying, from countries of much smaller populations; (not to mention the fighting was on their land); means that they sacrificed a lot more.

And yeah, you're racist for hating the French. Because you clearly hate them, not their stance in this one situation, just like all the other idiots doing stupid anti-France crap. It's a funny thing, but there is a definite anti-France group of people in the United States that hate the French just because they're French, no matter what they do. There are a ton of stereotypes about them. But anyone who actually knows anything about the French knows they aren't true. Damn. It pisses me off.

HERE IS WHY I CALL YOU A RACIST. You, and many others like you, are blowing this thing way out of proportion BECAUSE it is the French who are opposing us. If it was anyone else, you anti-France morons wouldn't be throwing such a ****fit about it.

They aren't supporting us in invading Iraq. So you respond by bringing up old conflicts, stereotypes, re-naming freaking french fries, and in general behaving like a angry three year old. That's racist. And yes, their economy was severely hurt by their stance against us. Why? Because Americans stopped buying French products, even though it had nothing to do with the Invading Iraq conflict.

Ugh. It's just stupid.

Also; so many people come on here all the time "God Bless America! Go Army! Screw Everyone Else! President Bush is God incarnate! France sucks! Christianity and homophobes live on!" I swear, there are a ton of you that have all those stances mashed into one! So in a way I had an idea of why you hated the French even before you explained yourself. Go ahead and cry stereotypes, it's not the same. And I still think I was right, even if you don't want to admit it.
Picture of Andrewcon
Registered: June 11, 2004
Posts: 219
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
"- even when they know you are wrong."

Why wouldn't someone argue with someone who was wrong? That's the point of arguing-making the wrong one realize what, and who, is right. Knuckle dragging moron...

As for who is unintelligent, try to read you own post again. If you can, take elementary school over again, please. Then you can make semi-intelligent posts. That would be great for everyone.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*
Picture of marine16
Registered: February 22, 2002
Posts: 2066
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Redrepublican Esq. don't waste your breath with thise unintellignet entities. They will never undsrstand and will argue with you at all costs - even when they know you are wrong.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE*
Picture of Andrewcon
Registered: June 11, 2004
Posts: 219
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Okay, so you've finally decided which excuse to go with. Phew! It's about time... Anyway, even if you really did mean "cowardly coward," which is obviously what you are implying - after the fact that you said it and someone caught you - you are pretty stupid; why don't you make it easy on yourself and say, "I am a moronic moron!" Razz

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*

PS- Good job red! I am so glad you figured out your mistake with your "Mission Statement." At least it only took one post to correct you on that one! Big Grin
Picture of redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
yellow? yellow meant cowardice. i thought that went without saying. ok I AM NOT MAKING FUN OF THEM BECAUSE OF THEIR SKIN COLOR.

this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
Picture of Andrewcon
Registered: June 11, 2004
Posts: 219
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
"redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 451
posted June 21, 2004 02:11 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The Racism from Redrepublican
Redrepublican called "them" "yellow cowards." My opinion is that that is racism. It is equivalent to calling an "African-American" if that's what the population is calling it still, a "blackie." If he wanted to be "correct," he MIGHT have said "white," or maybe "oriental," if that was what he was referring to. I'm sure that the statement "yellow cowards" is considered racist to more than one person. If you can't see the racism in that statement, marine16, you've just given up all chances of being called intelligent.”

so if I called the Iraqi Republican Guard cowards I’m racist?? No its true. If I said I hate the French because of their huge noses or accents, something they cannot help, then and only then I would be racist. Calling them cowards is the truth! They run away from the issue at hand and expect their mighty friends to defend them. People call Bush a coward in some instances (although I don’t know why they call him a coward) are they racist?
How is calling the French “yellow cowards” anything like calling an African American “blackie”? you could call anyone a “yellow coward” if you don’t know “yellow” is an adjective for cowardice. Sry I didn’t know you were that slow.


*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.* "


You might want to check your Mission Statement again, redrepublican. Seems to me you aren't in the "coalition" anymore, according to your own standards, even. Copy and paste doesn't always work. Muah ha ha ha... "..didn't know you were that slow." You might not be racist if you called a particular group of people cowards, but you used a very general word ["yellow"] to describe a particular group. That is racism. Calling a group of people a derogatory term like coward is called generalization or stereotyping, which is often interpreted as racism when used to describe a large group of people. You called the French "yellow," which is something they can't help. And even if you meant "cowardly cowards," which is what you are implying you were saying (though it is just another excuse), it isn't the truth, it is an opinion. People calling Bush something is not racist, because it is one individual person. Not to mention cowardice is something one can overcome. Being a certain skin color is not something someone can prevent or change. All your post was doing was grabbing at possible excuses for using the word "yellow," not an actual argument. Oh, and marine16 (or was it Bushsupporter), it wasn't too long ago you told me that people who use shorter terms for words (for example, ttyl or lmao, if I remember correctly) would be considered unintelligent and wouldn't be apt to be accepted into the "coalition." Look above, and you will see the letters "Sry," short for "sorry."


*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*
Picture of redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
“The Racism from Redrepublican
Redrepublican called "them" "yellow cowards." My opinion is that that is racism. It is equivalent to calling an "African-American" if that's what the population is calling it still, a "blackie." If he wanted to be "correct," he MIGHT have said "white," or maybe "oriental," if that was what he was referring to. I'm sure that the statement "yellow cowards" is considered racist to more than one person. If you can't see the racism in that statement, marine16, you've just given up all chances of being called intelligent.”

so if I called the Iraqi Republican Guard cowards I’m racist?? No its true. If I said I hate the French because of their huge noses or accents, something they cannot help, then and only then I would be racist. Calling them cowards is the truth! They run away from the issue at hand and expect their mighty friends to defend them. People call Bush a coward in some instances (although I don’t know why they call him a coward) are they racist?
How is calling the French “yellow cowards” anything like calling an African American “blackie”? you could call anyone a “yellow coward” if you don’t know “yellow” is an adjective for cowardice. Sry I didn’t know you were that slow.


*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*
Picture of Andrewcon
Registered: June 11, 2004
Posts: 219
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Redrepublican called "them" "yellow cowards." My opinion is that that is racism. It is equivalent to calling an "African-American" if that's what the population is calling it still, a "blackie." If he wanted to be "correct," he MIGHT have said "white," or maybe "oriental," if that was what he was referring to. I'm sure that the statement "yellow cowards" is considered racist to more than one person. If you can't see the racism in that statement, marine16, you've just given up all chances of being called intelligent.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*
Picture of redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
if we wouldnt have stopped Hitler, the Soviets would have. Hitler never had a chance to go Atlantic.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE*
Picture of kelso03
Registered: October 01, 2003
Posts: 364
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
We sacrificed thousands of American lives on D-Day to save the fate of Europe.



And ultimately yourselves! America was not protected from Hitler! You didn't know who we was going to declare war on next!
Picture of redrepublican
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
-----"""Worthless hypocrite, Iceland. Are you aware that everything you're railing against, the Europeans pulled on us to get us into WWII? And probably WWI. We didn't initially want to go, but Europe begged and pleaded.
Screw America you say?
What we really should have done is said "Screw You" to the French and the rest of Western Europe.
redrepublican"""


Show me where I wrote this.


”-Idiot. It was beneficial for us to enter WW2. No one wanted a world ruled by Hitler, so we helped to stop it. Yes, the richest country in the world got off it's *** and helped an obviously corrupt and terrible genocidal man invading other countires. Poor us. We were clearly the ones who suffered in WW2. Everyone cry for the poor Americans who gave up so much of their meager wealth to help stop Hitler.”

We sacrificed thousands of American lives on D-Day to save the fate of Europe.



-----"""ICELAND you disgust me. learn your history. if it wasnt for us the French might still be under the cold grip of Germany. if it wasnt for our troops protecting the country currently, they would be vulenrable to even more attacks instigated by terror. we have bailed them out of two world wars and if it wasnt for us France might be under communist Russia.
the point is we have repayed our debt to the French and so much more. they owe us.
we arent asking them to go drop bombs we are just asking for support. is that too much to ask?"""

This I put.

”Idiot. I know my history; maybe that's why I'm not a BOO FRANCE! racist (yes, hating the French is racist, just like hating Chinese people or Mexican people or Polish people is racist). As for your "If it weren't for us they would have been...." Who cares! It's in the past. Give it up. How can you people not see that that argument gets you nowhere, since anyone can easily trump that by pointing out that if it wasn't for the French you'd be serving the English king? So just drop that dumb arguement.

Secondly, yes, it is too much to ask. Why do they HAVE TO give us their suport? Face it; not everyone agrees on everything. Aww, too bad, and you just assumed everyone would agree with the U.S.! The solution is not to whine and cry when someone disagrees with you. Just because they're not saluting the U.S. flag doesn't mean they hate us. It just means they don't want to go to war for us, for a war they are against. So leave them to their own opinion, and their own actions. As long as they aren't attacking us, or anyone else, who cares! They're not the ones pissing their pants, renaming their food, or boycotting OUR products, because WE don't support THEM!”

It is not racist! They are people who don’t have the common decency to repay kindness. That’s why. Get off your high horse and don’t misread posts. (that goes for everyone who’s called me a racist) wow if I’m a racist then the whole world was and is chock full of them. if I hated Hitler Germany, would I be a racist? If I hated Mussolini Italy would I be a racist? No I don’t not think so. All the people who hate America are racist? No so stop saying that. No there is a difference and I don’t want to damn the French to Hell but they should repay kindness. The French were under a contractual treaty under the terms of NATO. It was their duty to help us. We aren’t asking them to ****ing go to war! To deploy several hundred soldiers for a peace mission isnt too much to ask. Stop bringing up history like you told me moron! There wouldn’t be a history in France had it not been for the Americans. "Past" is an important part to any culture or nation. If you don’t realize history repeats itself and if countries don’t have decency or gratitude then we are heading down the path to destruction of no return. WE don’t have any products! What are you talking about? Maybe we should take the US troops out of France who are supporting their economy and see if they stand a chance without our protection! If they will not help us even when we are protecting their country then we have no business being friends with them.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE*
Picture of ICELAND
Registered: July 28, 2003
Posts: 2838
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
-----"""Worthless hypocrite, Iceland. Are you aware that everything you're railing against, the Europeans pulled on us to get us into WWII? And probably WWI. We didn't initially want to go, but Europe begged and pleaded.
Screw America you say?
What we really should have done is said "Screw You" to the French and the rest of Western Europe.
redrepublican"""

-Idiot. It was beneficial for us to enter WW2. No one wanted a world ruled by Hitler, so we helped to stop it. Yes, the richest country in the world got off it's *** and helped an obviously corrupt and terrible genocidal man invading other countires. Poor us. We were clearly the ones who suffered in WW2. Everyone cry for the poor Americans who gave up so much of their meager wealth to help stop Hitler.



-----"""ICELAND you disgust me. learn your history. if it wasnt for us the French might still be under the cold grip of Germany. if it wasnt for our troops protecting the country currently, they would be vulenrable to even more attacks instigated by terror. we have bailed them out of two world wars and if it wasnt for us France might be under communist Russia.
the point is we have repayed our debt to the French and so much more. they owe us.
we arent asking them to go drop bombs we are just asking for support. is that too much to ask?"""

Idiot. I know my history; maybe that's why I'm not a BOO FRANCE! racist (yes, hating the French is racist, just like hating Chinese people or Mexican people or Polish people is racist). As for your "If it weren't for us they would have been...." Who cares! It's in the past. Give it up. How can you people not see that that argument gets you nowhere, since anyone can easily trump that by pointing out that if it wasn't for the French you'd be serving the English king? So just drop that dumb arguement.

Secondly, yes, it is too much to ask. Why do they HAVE TO give us their suport? Face it; not everyone agrees on everything. Aww, too bad, and you just assumed everyone would agree with the U.S.! The solution is not to whine and cry when someone disagrees with you. Just because they're not saluting the U.S. flag doesn't mean they hate us. It just means they don't want to go to war for us, for a war they are against. So leave them to their own opinion, and their own actions. As long as they aren't attacking us, or anyone else, who cares! They're not the ones pissing their pants, renaming their food, or boycotting OUR products, because WE don't support THEM!
Picture of marine16
Registered: February 22, 2002
Posts: 2066
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Andrewcon, if the best you can do is attack someone's spelling, then perhaps they are right. If they were wrong you would be able to attack them on other, more approriate, things. If I were you, I would treat your defense lawyer with a little more respect.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE*
Picture of Andrewcon
Registered: June 11, 2004
Posts: 219
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
You didn't prove anything. In fact, you didn't even state "nationality" in your original post, you liar. You are simply upset that you got caught. It's okay. I won't anything against a mental ward's patient. "...YOU POMPOUS OVERBEARING FOOL." I highly doubt you know the true meaning of those words, as your spelling and grammar lacks more than that of my seven year old brother.

*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the so-called Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, Redrepublican and Andrewcon in their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated YouthNOISE.*