Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
|
Registered: January 08, 2004
Posts: 1
|
before i was sure that he wouldn't be reelected, but now with the capture of saddam and his new policy on allowing illegal immigrants more benefits his popularity is bound to increase and plus the competition isn't doig to well with the public.
|

Registered: December 15, 2003
Posts: 168
|
I pray to God that he's not. He's already done enough damage to this country and Iraq. He's ruined our economy, our environment, and gotten us into a pointless war that will take at least twenty years before we're out of it. 
|

Registered: August 17, 2003
Posts: 495
|
I am a Bush supporter but if Bush was not reelected i don't think it would bother me that much. If you think about it how much does the president really affect your life? Most of his decisions deal with things involving government and the supreme court etc. but he doesn't decide things like what you will eat for lunch today or what movie you should go see tonight. He doesnt even affect your school which is the most liberal part of your life as a student. Schools are a state run association not national. The main way he really affects your life is by your parents' taxes. idk, i guess it's fun to fight w/ everybody about who should be president but it seems like a waste of time to debate about things that don't have anything to do w/ us.
|
|
Registered: April 11, 2004
Posts: 1
|
I think he will he shouldn't he will because people know what we will do not because he was a good presedent. 
|
|
Registered: July 05, 2003
Posts: 76
|
i hope bush doesnt get re~elected but then again personally i dontrealy like any of the canidates so who knows im not even old enough to vote so what does it matter what i think  not to mention i dont agree with anything the government does any way we are so worried about other countries being told what to do well we are too although we do have more freedoms than others i still dont think we can consider ourselves free
|

Registered: October 26, 2003
Posts: 1977
|
Kerry the ketchup man.
|

Registered: August 17, 2001
Posts: 6970
|
Gah, Kerry will destroy the country, and Bush will do the same.
|

Registered: October 26, 2003
Posts: 1977
|
I think that it will be a close race.
|
|
Registered: April 04, 2003
Posts: 173
|
quote: Better a Bush that we know instead of a left-wing freak show Democrat, who'll probably have sex romps in the Oval Office like the last Democratic president...
Excuse me? If I were you I would have said "better a "left-wing freak show democrat than a liar who destroyed the economy and started a war."
|

Registered: March 09, 2004
Posts: 2913
|
Counties won by Gore: 677 Counties won by Bush: 2436 Population of counties won by Gore: 127 Million Population of counties won by Bush: 143 Million Square miles of country won by Gore: 580,000 Square miles of country won by Bush: 2,427,000 States won by Gore: 19 States won by Bush: 29 Source: USA Today Looking at these numbers helps one to understand the wisdom of our forefathers in creating the Electoral College system. The difference in the vote count in just New York City might have elected Al Gore, in a popular vote only system. National Popular Vote for Gore 50,996,116 National Popular Vote for Bush 50,456,169 Electoral Votes for Gore 266 Electoral Votes for Bush 271 Source: AP 12/22/2000
|
|
Registered: February 23, 2004
Posts: 39
|
Better a Bush that we know instead of a left-wing freak show Democrat, who'll probably have sex romps in the Oval Office like the last Democratic president... 
|
|
Registered: February 08, 2004
Posts: 123
|
"Although the Democrats did try to steal the election by attempting to deny military members the right to vote"
The democrats simply attempted (unsuccessfully) to discount votes that had been sent in after the deadline.
"BUSH WON THE ELECTORAL VOTE. Popular vote is all well and good, but Gore lost."
Popular vote is EVERYTHING. The electoral college does not take into account MARGIN of victory. The candidate gets the same amount of electoral votes whether he won by 1 vote or 10 million.
|

Registered: April 01, 2003
Posts: 106
|
I think he probably will...but..then the world would come to an end because of the way he works. He's a sorry excuse for a person and should die.
|
|
Registered: May 23, 2003
Posts: 1072
|
Well, seeing as this is the year a new 36-year cycle in Presidential politics starts, it's time for Bush to go bye-bye.
NuShoesAgain, two words: VOTE FRAUD!
|

Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
|
Just fact, ICM. Were you born before the 2000 election? If so, odds are you followed it. The 7-member, Democrat Florida Supreme Court gave Gore the first recount 7-0, and continued to vote along partisan lines until the Supreme Court finally said "enough".
|

Registered: March 08, 2003
Posts: 2426
|
no...more then enough people are angry over using our tax money for religious structures.
And the bill he is trying to pass to limit overtime pay is not winning any votes from the working class...his days are numbered.
People are looking to the Green Party to undo the destruction of our forests at the hands of Bush.
Do I still think he did some good things...yup...but he's losing it now...
|

Registered: October 17, 2003
Posts: 4624
|
Yes, he is trying to lower the years immagrants have to wait to become a US citizen, trying to lower taxes, and having the health benifit and trying to teach abstinence. This has happened in history before, he will get most of the immagrants vote (well, for Bush's Party) and get the vote of most of the people who have high taxes. People who can't afford health coverage and the other people who want abstinence taught. Also, he will get most of the people who said 'Yes' for the war with Iraq... it's obvious. But, I think he is better than Kerry and Dean, ect. He's done a lot for this country, you have to admit. -Sunset 
|

Registered: April 28, 2003
Posts: 1271
|
ah nushoes, back to baseless accusations again are we?
|

Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
|
Although the Democrats did try to steal the election by attempting to deny military members the right to vote, the fact is that BUSH WON THE ELECTORAL VOTE. Popular vote is all well and good, but Gore lost. If you don't like the Constitution, change it. Since the Democrats would love to supress the white and rural vote by eliminating the Electoral College, I'd want to eliminate the House of Representatives to make up for that and assign three Senators to rural states.
Of course, the current system is probably a little better, because the EC in no way violates the equal protection since it does not accord any group an unfair amount of protection. In fact, it's entire purpose is to ensure that the votes of smaller states and rural voters are counted at all, which the urban liberals would love nothing more than to surpress.
|
|
Registered: May 23, 2003
Posts: 1072
|
According to the parameters set by the constitution, it's not legal for Republicans to keep Blacks off of vote rolls and out of voting booths, and the Electoral College violates equal protection under the law...
It's not about Electoral College versus Popular Vote, though I think the Electoral College is unconstitutional and outdated, its about the fact that GORE WON BOTH THE POPULAR AND ELECTORAL VOTES. Repeat with me you stupid mother****ers: RECOUNTING IS NOT STEALING AN ELECTION, RECOUNTING IS NOT STEALING AN ELECTION, RECOUNTING IS NOT STEALING AN ELECTION.
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|