we would not be safe with kerry in office. i am glad that we have a presedent that stays on the attack and not let them come to us.
They did and now they are going to die. if you dont unerstand that you are very stupid. it is not W falt that we are at war its the people who attacked us fault. listen if we new that 9-11 was coming do you think that W would of let in happen think again

TO add to the mystery, the fourth plane that was "downed" by the "people" in the plane after they "took control of the plane" was being watched by the military. Then, suddenly, just as it goes over a farmer's field in Pennsilvania, where nobody could get hurt, it hits the ground...yeah, right...That plane was shot down by the government, but people do not want to hear things like that, so it was hushed up.

Hello, im new to YouthNoise and i wanted to say that Bush probably did know about 9-11 if you think it over it is highly unprobable (yet possible) that two huge A&A planes could go into New York, "The City that never sleeps", unnoticed and unharmed. There is a lot of mystery revolving 9-11 nowadays... For example the attack on the Pentagon was also supposed to be by a plane; nevertheless, no plane pieces have been found, YOU didnt see the pieces of the plane on the news and it is just impossible a 747 to dissapear without living trace (in the World Trade Center there was leftovers from the planes). All witnesses of the attack to the pentagon did not see the plane but heard a loud whistiling noise (like a missile). There is also the factor of the hole... that hole is too perfect to be done by a huge 747 (which's pilot, by the way, has not been captured).The surveillance tapes that got on film the white flying object were taken away by the FBI fifteen minutes after the attack.... all these facts let you wondering if this was a real attack to the US or just an excuse to go into the Middle East

It's always a possibility.

Some rumors have been spread that the government did know, but didn't do anything. Rumors generally have a grain of truth in them.

Woah... Redrepublican. It's been awhile.

Here's what I think. I feel like it was preventable if we believe every single threat we recieve. The government recieves thousands of threats a day, even terrorist threats. If we take action for every single one, we would have no time to live our lives, and realistically 95% of those threats aren't real, so you can't take all of them seriously. So to pick this ONE threat out that was real would've been very hard. So even though it was avoidable, realistically it wasn't easy.

it was very preventable...by former administrations Clinton's for instance. and i hate bringing that back up but i think it is a poiint htat needs to be put out there for people.
15 were from Saudi Arabia. that doesnt mean that the gov't supports terrorism. im not saying it doesnt but as of right now there is nothing that points any other way.
and he did go after the terrorists he went after UBL intel indicates we were very close to getting the man. i am confident that we will get him. it is a great thing that all the terrorists are opouring into iraq.
some of you will alugh but if you do actually look at it, its true. how woudl you rather ahve it? terrorists spread across the world or in one country where it is much easier to fight them.
propose how to find UBL. if intelligence doesnt show anything new, how is that his fault? he cant control he intelligence!
and he has gone after the terrorists. need i point out htat 75% of the Al Qaeda's leaders are dead or are in custody? and needless to say tis is not the war on Al-Qaeda soley.
this is the war on TERRORISM which constitutes ALL terrorist organizations such as Al-Zarqawi's which was based in Baghdad. Such as that oter terorist whose name i cannot spell. the pakistani WMD scientist's network has been brought to justice. 400,000 tons of weapons have been destroyed in iraq.
we did not lose bin laden.
it is wrong to blame bush for the deep intelligence cuts that were put in place by clinton and liberal allies. cuts so deep they crippled the nation. im not blaming it soley on bush nor clinton. all for now.

To answer your question, Wanderingsoul, look around. What is happening now?

Bush didn't go after the terrorists. He went into Iraq. 15 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. He did go after Osama bin Laden, but he did not catch him. I would love for him to go after the terrorists, I really would.

Maybe he will, now that he has been reelected.
He has 4 years to dig himself out of this horrible war.

look people, i dont want to get in the middle of your presidental debates here, so im gonna keep it short: what would happen if bush didnt go after the terrorist? what then?

The fact is,Bush did let it happen! I believe that it was preventable. He should have read the reports and memos.

Secondly, it is President Bush's fault that we are at war with Iraq. Iraq did not attack us. 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. We lost Bin Laden. At the moment, no, we are not going after the people who attacked us. We are occupying an innocent country and killing thousands of soldiers and civilians!
Our freedom is not being threatened! I think we would be much safer with Kerry in office.

[/QUOTE] it is not W falt that we are at war its the people who attacked us fault. listen if we new that 9-11 was coming do you think that W would of let in happen think again[/QUOTE]

I think you have forgotten the people who attacked us died in the attack.

It's Al-Qaeda, not alkaida. Good try though.

Goleafs: Bin Laden said on his tape that we have at equal chances of attack with Bush and Kerry. And do you really think that if Kerry came into office he would let terrorists attack us? Sure... that's realistic.

Iraq didn't attack the u.s., alkaida and osama binladen did. Maybe you should be more careful about who you call stupid. I mean seriously, it almost makes me laugh when I read your post.

P.S. Almost the entire world hates Bush and as a result are not likeing america as much. Also Iraq has become a breeding ground for terrorists. They hate america more now than then.