I'm concerned that Dean may not have the stones to defend America. Certainly, he doesn't have close to the courage of Bush. Unfortunately, he has no track record to speak of, so is an unknown. Plus, we know he is generally anti-war, which may mean he presents more of a danger the the U.S. at this juncture in our history.

Actually, he was elected according to the rules set forth in the Constitution of the United States, a document which liberals seem to be extremely selective in interpreting. If you don't like the Electoral College, petition to amend it, but don't try to get your partisan courts to rewrite and redefine the law mid-stream, as liberal courts are known to do. And don't try to get them to recount over and over until they can fake a result they like.
If I could amend the Constitution, I'd all but strip away any authority of the courts.
And inasfar as true enemies of the U.S., the Democrats and the socialists stand with Al-Qaeda. But even Al-Qaeda's goals aren't being funded by the American taxpayer. And one of this is one of the most important things any citizen can remember.

It is not a stereotype, it is not a stereotype and it is not a stereotype.

No action George W. Bush takes in the White House can be taken as valid, he was never in any sense of the term elected as President of the United States of America. Therefore, everytime he acts as President, he is commiting treason and should be elected. A huge majority of his actions are invalid for their individual merits, but they are all invalid by their very nature. George W. Bush is a vicious enemy of the United States of America.

quote:

---

EVERYTHING HE DOES IS IN SELF-INTEREST.

---

This is a stereotype that the liberal have to get over, if it's possibly to get past such their bigotry. It's also a case of the proverbial pot calling the kettle black, considering the last president and his wife were possibly the most self-interested, self-promoting people that ever lived.

But anyway, Bush will have to deal with yet another mess Clinton created, sooner or later - a mess that could kill millions of people, millions of Americans. Good job, liberals.

Oh yes, I'm glad Bush has done so much to protect us from the North Korean threat. Oh wait, EVERYTHING HE DOES IS IN SELF-INTEREST.

quote:

---

So, NewShoes, you think that policy should be run on testosterone, right?

---

I would rather it be run the way it is than run on pure cowardice, appeasement, and even aid of terrorism, as the liberals and U.N. have done. Thanks to liberal policies, a complete freakin' lunatic in N. Korea has nuclear weapons, and possibly the ICBMs on which to mount them. Thanks to liberal policies, China has a space program that could do the same thing. Thanks to liberal policies, terrorists have been turned down from capture so they could attack America.

So what do the U.N./liberals do? They flex their estrogen by having us "secure" P.O.S. places like Kosovo, Somalia, and Liberia...where we have absolutely no business whatsoever being in. Sure, instead of bringing down the likes of Usama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and the Taliban, they'd rather take military action against those nations that pose no threat to us, directly or indirectly. When it comes to national security, the left's stupidity is stunning.

Pre-emptive war is not defense. Bush has done precious little to actually defend our country.

Anyone but Bush: 2004.

So, NewShoes, you think that policy should be run on testosterone, right?

yea, well, we've got even more quotes that bush supporters would rather not remember... and they're much worse than anything Dean ever said.

Probably less biased than the New York Times.

At any rate, it has some collected quotes. Maybe some that Dean supporters would rather not remember, no doubt, but it's still an interesting resource.

Rightwingnews?

That's gotta be unbiased.

quote:

---

Howard Dean for President...

Just because someone is Anti-War doesn't make them a p***y,and it sure as hell doesn't disqualify them for the Presidency...In that case Eisenhower, and F.D.R weren't qualified to be President...Eisenhower ran on a campaign slogan "Ike kept us out of war"(WW1), and F.D.R was elected for 4 terms, and he was hesitant to get us in WW2...So in that case we had 2 p***y Presidents, hmm...

quote:

What else do you got to throw out?, hmm...I'm ready for them

---

Wow, your ignorance is astounding. First off, it was Wilson, not IKE (a former general and huge Cold Warrior!) who ran on the slogan "He kept us out of the war." Secondly, Wilson was not anti-war, in fact he imprisoned anti-War protestors, radicals, and dissenters during WWI. Lastly, FDR tried very hard to get the US more involved in WWII. Ever hear of a little thing called "lend lease"? It was only because Isolationism being so common in the US that FDR was unable to send troops.

Still again, with everyone backing me here I say...PROVE YOUR POINT!...What is it about Dean that you don't like?...or do you like anybody for that matter?...What's your political stance?

Oh, would you like me to recap some of his own quotes? Dean himself does a better job of showing his total inability to handle foreign affairs than any of his Democratic opponents or any Republican strategist. Not the least of which the fact that he has no foreign policy experience! But when it comes to matters of war, he's an outright pu$$y, a fact for which he seems to be proud.

":

A favorite Deanism of mine:
"I think in general the ends do not justify the means." -- Howard Dean after we blew away Uday & Qusay Hussein. (Courtesy of Rightwingnews.com)

there is no point to your statement nushoes cause you have yet to prove that your statement is a fact. Where's your proof, the burden of proof is on your shoulders, not ours.

Just because someone is Anti-War doesn't make them a p***y,and it sure as hell doesn't disqualify them for the Presidency...In that case Eisenhower, and F.D.R weren't qualified to be President...Eisenhower ran on a campaign slogan "Ike kept us out of war"(WW1), and F.D.R was elected for 4 terms, and he was hesitant to get us in WW2...So in that case we had 2 p***y Presidents, hmm...

quote:

---

---

What else do you got to throw out?, hmm...I'm ready for them

the point is - and hasn't been refuted - is that Dean is too much of a p***y to defend America, thus disqualifying him from the Presidency.

Sounds kinda like slick willy, except he occasionally took time out tp poke pigs.

Hey look! It's the two symbols of the republican party! An elephant and a fat white guy who's afraid of change!

um, there's nothing courageous about sitting behind a desk, i do every day at school, and do i get awarded for it, no! wooohooo look at me, I'm dumba$$ bush and I'm so courageous for sitting behind a desk all day. PSSSSSSH! NOT!