Find, explore and network a cause.  
YN Home  
Home Causes Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
Search YN:
 
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of ampmaster
Registered: February 22, 2004
Posts: 13926
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
well I see a big flaw in your plan, if Israel attacks and holds any land that nelongs to a nation like Iran the whole islamic world will get every gun it has and attack and before any one says it the reason they(israel) has had the gaza strip is that they made a deal with Egypt to get that srtip of land if they gave the rest of the penisula back


"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Picture of istealkidsmoney
Registered: January 20, 2006
Posts: 9
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Because they have an insane President that publicly states that he wants the destruction of Israel! Any country with a leader like that should not be able to have weapons of mass destruction. I'm not just saying this because I support Israel. I believe that any country that wants the genocide of any group of people whether it be Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, etc. should not have weapons that allow them to possibly achieve their goal.

The reason why I think that they won't have any inhibitions and just start using nuclear weapons despite the obvious consequences of nuclear war is because of their leaders once again. The radical religious leaders advocate different values than we do. Different values is not a problem, but when the values they teach are to hate America and Israel more than you value your own life then that becomes a problem. I realize that the majority of people do not think this way and don't advocate suicide bombing, but in this age when one individual suicide bomber can cause large scale devestation, imagin what they could do if they had nuclear weapons.
Picture of sudha
Registered: March 29, 2003
Posts: 2613
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
though responsibility is the fundamental scare out here...if one country in the world can have nukes then why shoudnt everyone else be allowed to have them?
the same way that we look at the arab world as dangerous and the same reasons why we dont want them to have nukes could be the same reasons they look at the west as a threat or think of it as something dangerous...


Dont let ur studies interfere with ur education!!!!!
Picture of istealkidsmoney
Registered: January 20, 2006
Posts: 9
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Well we can't allow them to continue to make nuclear weapons because:
1) Their president is an anti semite that has publicly declared that he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.
2) Supposedly they want to develop nuclear power for "energy". They're sitting on a seemingly endless supply of oil, they don't need more energy. They want nuclear weapons for bullying power.

So what do we do about it? Well, we're already overextended. We can't afford to attack Iran because we're funneling all of our money into Iraq. Embargo's are really out of the question because we cannot function as a nation without oil from Iran (another reason why Bushie should have made oil independence a top priority, so we wouldn't have to rely on these oppressive rigimes. But that's another rant.) So what option does that leave? Well nothing really. Isreal will probably take care of it and they should because it is a direct threat to them, not us.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3