| Find, explore and network a cause. |
|
Go  |
New |
Find |
Notify |
|
Reply |
|
Admin |
New PM! |
Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 3802
|
Yes! Test the rats, not the mice, mice are cute.
It must be lovely to wake up in the morning and understand everything.
|
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 5959
|
We could only test on animals that cause trouble, if that makes you feel better...
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|
Registered: May 18, 2006
Posts: 3802
|
quote: I just think that there are more compassionate, but still accurate ways to find information
example?
It must be lovely to wake up in the morning and understand everything.
|
Registered: October 04, 2006
Posts: 13
|
Of course I don't agree with human testing, I just think that there are more compassionate, but still accurate ways to find information, such as using our advanced technology to learn rather than making innocent animals suffer.
Love In Life, Live In Love.
|
Registered: May 03, 2005
Posts: 258
|
PETA makes me laugh. for the USEFUL enhancement of human scientific knowledge, I believe animal testing is necessary and justifiable. Useful meaning genetic study, creating parsimonious phylogenetic trees to determine evolutionary relationships, etc. not testing for a fucking beauty product... fucking girls 
"No, this trick won't work...How on earth are you ever going to explain in terms of chemistry and physics so important a biological phenomenon as first love?" - Albert Einstein
|
Registered: August 09, 2006
Posts: 1074
|
I totally support animal testing but i do pity the poor useless beasts i am now in favor of baby testing (yes PETA jump through the hoop). Seriously though i do support animal testing.
The original draft of The Lord of the Rings featured Chuck Norris instead of Frodo Baggins. It was only 5 pages long, as Chuck roundhouse-kicked Sauron's ass halfway through the first chapter.
|
Registered: March 30, 2005
Posts: 3628
|
This is a hard topic. Being a vegetarian, I'm obviously against it, but I don't really want to get involved in the whole PETA thing. . . Honestly, though, I'd rather we tested on animals than on humans. Imagine the uproar that would cause.
"I imagine a lot of people tune in simply to watch reporters get bitch-slapped by Mother Nature, and frankly, who can blame them?� Anderson Cooper
|
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 5959
|
Animal testing that doesn't provide benefits to humanity is cruel and unnecessary. Other than that, I don't much care. The good of the many outweigh the good of the few. And we can't very well test on humans, can we now?
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|
Registered: August 05, 2006
Posts: 337
|
I reject your poll. It is biased. 1. It assumes animal testing is cruel. 2. It fails to mention that Animal Testing does wield benefits. 3. It highlights absolutely not, showing bias. 4. It doesn't provide a nuetral option. 5. The Animal Testing option shows favoritism towards non-animal testing, and falls under the false dilemma arguement (You support animal testing, therefore you must want to kill animals, and have no regard for their life.)
Cheated the way from fringe to elite. Clique of stylists, rounded illogic skipping a beat to a dead cert. By lheaving charges and bursting the abscess, with a forked toungue, bloated with courage and spewing self-importance. Drop your sights, aim lower, leave umblemished those with real power.
|
Registered: October 04, 2006
Posts: 13
|
Okay, the title is a little incorrect. . . we should ALL know animal testing is CRUEL, but it's whether you care that it is cruel to animals or whether you don't mind the suffering of innocent creatures who do nothing wrong but exist, while the human race destroys the Earth for not only themselves, but the animals too.
Love In Life, Live In Love.
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
