
Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
|
So yeah, I was reading up on this man (better known as Dr. Dino), and noticed how astronomers, geologists, biologists, and other natural scientists so very easily disproved everything he said. My theory is, if you believe Dr. Horvind, you're a boob who doesn't have the synapses to make logical connections between scientific facts. In fact, Dr. Horvind's theories are so flawed it's sad that anyone would even dare beleive it to be true. But hey, if the Creationists think I'm wrong, I'll be more than happy to show you why I'm not. I need a debate! It's like heroin to me, I need it now!
|

Registered: March 13, 2002
Posts: 3477
|
I really want those nautiloid fossils on the left side of that website. They're beautiful.
"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"
|

Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6040
|
This is exactly how I feel about the matter. See, Dr. Dino is one of the reasons why I make a distinction between Creationism (religious science) and Intelligent Design (scientific religion). The man isn't even a doctor. He probably had some college science, but he bases all his arguments off a literal interpretation of Genesis. Way to be scientific.
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|

Registered: January 16, 2004
Posts: 3993
|
I've heard of him, he seems about as credible as Jack Chick.
L'enfer, c'est les autres. -Jean-Paul Sartre
|

Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
|
|

Registered: July 26, 2003
Posts: 5005
|
Oh. I've never heard of him.
What if what you think is great, really is great, but it's not as great as something greater?
|