YN Home  
Home Causes Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
Search YN:
 
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Picture of smellypants
Registered: March 03, 2005
Posts: 9
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
me and my friends have used a weegee board and we want to know what the risks are and what u have to do and just all about it!
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
What I meant to say was ouija not ouiji. Sorry about that.
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6040
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Ouija. There's only one i.

I don't play with them either. But that's because I like to make better use of my time than pretend I'm talking to spirits.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Someone already told her that it was spelled ouiji. It's like on the 2nd. page.
I just thought that I'd tell you that.
Not everyone plays with ouiji boards. I don't.
Picture of xxnothingmatters
Registered: November 01, 2005
Posts: 24
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
ouija**


xxlovemetender
Picture of xxnothingmatters
Registered: November 01, 2005
Posts: 24
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
hey honey, learn how to spell. its ouiji board, got it?

dont get your panties in a twist. there is no risk to those things.

reason 1: they dont work
reason 2: even if they did, communicating with a dead person is not fatal.


xxlovemetender
Picture of EarthGoddess
Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
ok then
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6040
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Just stop it already, both of you. Personal vendettas are pointless.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of EarthGoddess
Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
You (rugar) Suck (you are a dumbass or you are extremely uncool or you perform sexual acts with your mouth).
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Like I said your point is what
Picture of EarthGoddess
Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Your point is what
Picture of EarthGoddess
Registered: January 15, 2003
Posts: 3709
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Whatever Roll Eyes
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6040
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
If the world was covered in water, why didn't the Egyptians notice? At the time of the alleged Biblical flood, the Egyptian empire was at its peak. If the whole world had indeed been covered by water (wiping out everyone except Noah and his buddies) then surely the Egyptians would have been engulfed as well. However, that simply isn't the case. The Egyptians lived through the "flood" with nary a hiccup. The Biblical flood was (according to the most prevalent theory) the breaking of the Mediterranean into a rather large valley, thus creating the Black Sea as we know it now. Since that was the area where the Hebrews of Noah's time lived, it makes sense.

And as for the sea shells on mountain tops, have you ever heard of plate tectonics? Those large outcroppings of rock we call mountains weren't there forever. They were pushed up by the violent movements of the Earth's plates. The Rocky Mountains, for instance, were once covered over by a large inland sea which spanned the whole central part of North America. Only fairly recently (in geologic terms) were they pushed up to form the highest mountain chain in America.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of rugar
Registered: October 23, 2005
Posts: 417
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
If the world wasn't covered in water at one time then why is scientist finding seashells on top of mountains?
Picture of Euterpe
Registered: September 29, 2004
Posts: 3690
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Did Mell just imply there is witchcraft in the Bible? Blasphemy! Wink


A lo hecho, pecho.
Picture of clpo13
Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6040
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
The Bible is hardly an objective source of information. Do you think I'm going to take the word of a book that says the entire world was once covered by water, even though there is no evidence for such a thing ever happening?

Besides, show me one recorded incident of witchcraft actually being performed. I can't find anything.


The more you know, the less you don't know.
Picture of Mell777
Registered: November 01, 2005
Posts: 1
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
How do you know there's no witchcraft? have you researched it? try reading the bible
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5