YN Home  
Home Causes Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
Search YN:
 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of istealkidsmoney
Registered: January 20, 2006
Posts: 9
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
A lot of us complain about the war in Iraq and how Bush handled the whole situation. We also discuss how we shouldn't have gone to war at all, but all of these are pretty much meaningless because we did go to war. This discussion is about what do you think the best option is as of right now? If you were the President, how would you deal with our situation in the Middle East?
Picture of Hydrok
Registered: August 14, 2004
Posts: 3132
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
For all you people that want to protect the Kurds, I want one good reason why they shouldn't be exterminated.

The Kurds are the original Iraqi insurgents, prior to the fall of Saddam... saddam gassed them because they were a disuption to the government, they are one small minority of a largly sunni and shia country... they will not conform, they believe they should have their own country... well I saw we give it to them and then let the turks annhialate them.


"So others may die" - USAF Intel Targeteer Motto (607th AIS)
Picture of ampmaster
Registered: February 22, 2004
Posts: 13981
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Yeah the three Iraqi states are mixed muslim and one where all the Kurds are so the muslims don't have to deal with them this is where we should put bases cause the kurds freakin love us (see link below for more on this)

http://boards.youthnoise.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4994004831/m/7571014


"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Picture of FreedomisnotFree8
Registered: April 28, 2006
Posts: 32
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by CheeseLemons:
I'm am all for the war, rock on Bush! He is did just what he needed to do. Big Grin



ABSOULOUTLY! I know a sniper who is going to IRAQ soon! I SUPPORT TROOPS AND BUSH!


My Dad would make an AWESOME President!
Picture of bluedemocrat
Registered: December 14, 2004
Posts: 5770
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
I'm am all for the war, rock on Bush! He is did just what he needed to do. Big Grin


Elaborate please? I don't know if there is a solution. I'd seriously look into dividing the country, at this point. Protect the Kurds too.


They'll like us when we win - Toby Ziegler.
Picture of CheeseLemons
Registered: November 18, 2004
Posts: 15
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I'm am all for the war, rock on Bush! He is did just what he needed to do. Big Grin


I'm CheeseLemons and that's my opinion
Picture of phantom119
Registered: October 19, 2005
Posts: 323
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
leave snipers, and use aerial attack


It's kinda difficult to hold a whole country with only a select few (snipers). Snipers are just one man, they can't cover a whole country. You use snipers in special operations when the one bullet could change the tide of battle or an operation. Aircraft are great but limited. First they need intelligence and targeting data, and that comes from infantry. And then they don't carry enough ordanance to wage a complete war. Ground troops (army and marines) are the basis of holding a country. Airforce and Navy is there to support them.

What would I do? Really get serious about this. This would be political suicide but it'd get the job done....execute terrorists and other people who violently attack US troops. That'd stop them in a heartbeat. Just get mean dog nasty, the warped mentality of the terrorists would respond to that power, not touchy feely crap.


"The price of Freedom is paid in lives" - Adm. Geoffrey Tolwyn
Picture of ampmaster
Registered: February 22, 2004
Posts: 13981
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
see here: http://boards.youthnoise.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4994004831/m/7571014

also you can't hold land with airpower and a few snipers you need Armor and Infantry, Basic tactics since the start of modern combat (the Civil War btw)


"The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done"."
Picture of istealkidsmoney
Registered: January 20, 2006
Posts: 9
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
What about rebuilding Iraq?
Picture of yoda3600
Registered: January 21, 2006
Posts: 48
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I would pull out all the ground troops, leave snipers, and use aerial attack. It makes sense.


"Do or do not, there is no try."-Yoda
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community