Registered: January 06, 2003
Posts: 1185
|
|
Registered: March 13, 2002
Posts: 3477
|
quote: Originally posted by DontBeAFool:
War should be used as a last resort, and a country should always seek peaceful ways to resolve issues before resulting to war. I feel that Bush doesn't try to do this and jumps into wars without fully considering the consequences.
Then why aren't we in Iran and/or nuking China?
"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"
|
Registered: November 23, 2005
Posts: 15
|
War should be used as a last resort, and a country should always seek peaceful ways to resolve issues before resulting to war. I feel that Bush doesn't try to do this and jumps into wars without fully considering the consequences.
|
Registered: December 14, 2004
Posts: 5770
|
War can be the answer. War was the solution to disposing of evil, facist dictators like Hitler. How would you have suggested that the United States and Western Democracies deal with Hitler?
They'll like us when we win - Toby Ziegler.
|
Registered: August 14, 2004
Posts: 3132
|
Someone really has to teach you all how to word poll choices better...
"So others may die" - USAF Intel Targeteer Motto (607th AIS)
|
Registered: November 23, 2005
Posts: 9
|
quote: Originally posted by babbyangel67:
waldo69 posted something that says that war is the answer and that we should be happy about it, but i strongly disagree, i dont think war is the answer to anything. maybe its jus me who thinks like this, but i want to know what everybody else thinks. Is war really the answer? Should we be glad that a war is going to happen?
I agree
KaTiE QuInN
|
Topics 
