Right before the election one of two things will happen:
We find Osama bin Laden
OR
We have another terrorist attack

What do you think?

quote:

---

it would have cost alot of time in division. and would have costed America.

---

To be blunt, who gives a ****? America is already divided. What's a few more days to verify the integrity of our elections? The way I see it, this country would be more united if more people were sure of the integrity of the system.

quote:

---

i do not think it was worth it.

---

Of course you don't. You wanted Bush to win. Had John Kerry won and reports of potential voter fraud surfaced, I would think you would be a little more interested in verifying the results than you currently are. No surprises there.

quote:

---

obviously he didnt either. kerry would have analyzed every source he had bfore he conceded.

---

I'm saying that was stupid of him. He obviously didn't analyze EVERY source, or else he didn't care about winning this election as much as I thought he did. It's also possible that he conceded so early that he didn't have the necessary sources available at that time to make the right decision.

Whatever. He was wrong to concede. I thought so then, and I think so now.

it would have cost alot of time in division. and would have costed America. i do not think it was worth it. obviously he didnt either. kerry would have analyzed every source he had bfore he conceded.

Better controversy than outright fraud. It wasn't classy, it was wussy. It's frightening how people in this country have lost interest in integrity just for the sake of "getting it over with".

i thought it was very...classy of kerry. he had america first. he didnt want to put them through the whole controversy. he had a good concession speech...or so im told.

I understand that. I think it was a bad decision on Kerry's part, but typical of him and of the Democratic "leadership". I still think it should be looked into.

Well Kerry conceded because he didn't want there to be any controversy or lawsuits over votes. That was his own choice.

Apparently you are not paying attention to the possible abuse of provisional ballots. I'm not saying it's true, but it's something worth investigating if such claims are being made. The integrity of our elections is everything.

Apparently neither happened.

pffffffffft, paintbucket, they don't need another terrorist attack when they've got voter fraud...

hahaha

gullible paranoid idiots.

Don't feel bad Paintbucket, I honestly thought something was going to happen also. I was thinking another "terrorist attack" led by our government. I know this sounds off the wall, but think about it.

What better way to try to make sure Bush would win than by staging another terrorist attack? Everyone would think 'Well, Bush got us through it the first time.'

I'm still waiting for Osama and the so-called terrorist attack.

bush cleaned it up?I would pick any one over bush!

I picked that day because it was close to the elections. Nov 9 is good though.

Any reason you went with October 30th? Arbitrary date before election? Nov 3 or 4 would make more sense... or even oct 31... or 9-11 or the day the prez is sworn in the next year... or nov 9th... that would be really witty.

Point.

quote:

---

It's an example of the extreme intolerance of the left.

---

Holy ****. Liberals are the intolerant ones? Where the **** do you get off saying that? Is this your first day, or something? Liberals are so intolerant, obviously, because we're the ones denying homosexuals their basic rights.

And where the **** did you get your information about Clinton being an idol for liberals? Just because he was a democrat and held office doesn't mean he's an idol for democrats. That's so ******* wrong.

And Clinton made this happen...how?

quote:

---

NuShoes, would you like to provide "links" or "proof" that the economy is Clinton's fault?

---

There are lots and and lots of sources.

And the world economy began declining in 1998. Notice that unemployment in the U.S. (as well as Japan and Germany) steadily rose throughout Clinton's presidency, culminating in a final verifiable 4.7106% in the fourth quarter of 1999. (About 1/4 of the page down.) By the way, this report is from one of your own sources, a union umbrella group.

And keep in mind that Enron and GlobalCrossing had been getting away with corporate murder for a long time under the watch of Clinton's SEC.