Don't try and tell me that i cant have an opinion.

Hey Knighthammer, I think your way too preoccupied with your own thoughts. Ever think of the thoughts of OTHERS? You cant always be right and just because you think you are doesn’t mean that you are. And we were NOT the only ones to come in and save everyone. There were plenty of other troops who went in as well.

quote:

We nuked japan because they had no interest in any peace so we showed them who they were f--king with and i think we made our point. To clarify things we have nukes but we dont go around pointing them at everyone. Iraq may have not had nukes but they were going in that direction. Iran should be delt with next north korea ooooh scary! how far did that last missle go? 50 feet? they cant touch us if they ever even got a good shoot our fail safe system would blow it up and send another missle right up kim jung ils ass speaking figuratively of course.

how exactly do you propose the US 'deals' with Iran? Remember it is vastly bigger than Iraq so the US barekly has enough reach to complete that task without overextending themselves, also there is no justification for a war on Iran, if you went in you would be going in alone, just like vietnam it would last for years and end in US defeat. And your attitude to North Korea is laughable, even if they do not have effective long range nuclear missiles they could still end a US invasion, remember the last time, North Korea was victorious.

Your whole attitude promoting american supremecy in the context of a school playground with america as the bully is ridiculous, you have no concept of international relations, nothing, i repeat nothing is ever done to 'show them who they are f--king with'. You speak of dealing with countries as if its as easy as dropping a bomb.

We nuked japan because they had no interest in any peace so we showed them who they were f--king with and i think we made our point. To clarify things we have nukes but we dont go around pointing them at everyone. Iraq may have not had nukes but they were going in that direction. Iran should be delt with next north korea ooooh scary! how far did that last missle go? 50 feet? they cant touch us if they ever even got a good shoot our fail safe system would blow it up and send another missle right up kim jung ils ass speaking figuratively of course.

quote:

Then how come the terrorists dont have one? Oh i know why because of one man George W. Bush who stopped saddam from obtaining them and dont throw that BS that we didnt find any at me. We didnt for one reason because they were hidden and smuggled out of iraq before we could get to them very simple conclusion to come to.

then why didnt mr bush invade iran? north korea? israel? these are all aggressive countries with possible nuclear programs. Iraq never had a nuclear weapon, if they were to get one it would have nothing to do with saddams regime, he never had relations with al-qaeda, that is proven and admitted by everyone.

do not forget America is the only country in the world to have used a nuclear weapon on people.

quote:

Originally posted by clpo13:
It is amusing how ignorant you are of how easily procured a nuclear warhead can be.

Then how come the terrorists dont have one? Oh i know why because of one man George W. Bush who stopped saddam from obtaining them and dont throw that BS that we didnt find any at me. We didnt for one reason because they were hidden and smuggled out of iraq before we could get to them very simple conclusion to come to.

It is amusing how ignorant you are of how easily procured a nuclear warhead can be.

Like I said we would never destroy mecca and medina so dont worry about the enormous threat of a bunch of cardboard signs. Just because we havent made a connection between saddaam and al qadea dosent mean it didnt at one time exist. And we found nuclear technology in iraq i strongly think that WMDs are in syria who is a known ally of terrorists troops found a chemical weapons plant in iraq is that not enough for you?

No i wouldn't call you a racist, just stupid. If we attacked then not only would the terrorist (who have no problem dying if they can take a couple of people with them) and then all muslims would be agianst the U.S.

quote:

well thankfully it will most likely never happen because those terrorists will never get nukes now that saddam is out of the picture.

saddam never gave, or intended to give nuclear weapons to terrorists, no WMDs were found in iraq meaning he complied fully with UN sanctions, also no connection between saddam and al-qaeda has ever been made and this has been admitted by the invading forces.

quote:

Originally posted by LoveTheRainbow:
It wouldn't happen even if the terrorists attacked us. Not even Bush is stupid enough to do that

It would be stupid but extremely effective and dont twist my words like i know you will and try to call me racist.

quote:

well thankfully it will most likely never happen because those terrorists will never get nukes now that saddam is out of the picture.

It wouldn't happen even if the terrorists attacked us. Not even Bush is stupid enough to do that

quote:

Originally posted by riskbreaker86:
no, it really would not. It would be the biggest make america could ever make.

well thankfully it will most likely never happen because those terrorists will never get nukes now that saddam is out of the picture.

no, it really would not. It would be the biggest make america could ever make.

quote:

Originally posted by riskbreaker86:
why would they attack mecca and medina? what strategic goal would it accomplish? nothing, it would be an international crime. Secondly, it would be an attack on Saudia Arabia, one of the US' biggest benefactors, an attack on Saudi Arabia would cripple the US economy and plunge the middleast into deeper conflict. Please get a grasp on international politics before you say stupid things. Islam has existed for hundreds of years, its people enjoy a superb culture,

which you would appreciete if you ever visit the area, it proffesses peace and is not the enemy.

I never said islam was the enemy i never said it would be pleasant but if the terrorists ever nuked us its what may happen.

why would they attack mecca and medina? what strategic goal would it accomplish? nothing, it would be an international crime. Secondly, it would be an attack on Saudia Arabia, one of the US' biggest benefactors, an attack on Saudi Arabia would cripple the US economy and plunge the middleast into deeper conflict. Please get a grasp on international politics before you say stupid things. Islam has existed for hundreds of years, its people enjoy a superb culture,

which you would appreciete if you ever visit the area, it proffesses peace and is not the enemy.

Islam may bot be the enemy but all those terrorists who did it would meet allah. You COMPLETELY missed my point. If any of those terrorists tried that mecca and medina would be destroyed. Destroy what your enemy holds dear and they have no reason to fight. I DO NOT hate muslims i hate terrorists and you call me a racist or whatever because no one has a right to NOT be offended.

quote:

We saved more lives by doing it then and i think that effectivly showed the world what you get if you push us. The main reason those terrorists havent tried that yet is because of the atom bombs and if they ever did try and bomb us it would be the end of the islamic religion.

i just realised your an adolescent, wasnt aware you were so young and that is why you argue as you do.

Terrorists are not scared of the atom bomb, for a start they are not affiliated with governemtns of nations, secondly the US would not use a nuke on a target it cannot identify, if the US was attacked where would they bomb in retaliation? the mountains between pakistan and afghanistan? your claim is ridiculous, what is also ridiculous is your end of islam claim.

IF the US is attacked by a nuclear weapon, why would they seek to destroy islam? islam isnt the enemy, all terrorist groups have a goal, in the case of al qaeda, to remove americans from their lands. It isn't motivated by islam and therefore islam is not the enemy. Secondly how would the US go about destroying islam? there are 1.2 billion muslims in the world, 22% of the worlds population and estimates between 1-12 million in the US. 209 million are in indonesia, there are 60 million in Turkey, a secular nation, and countless millions in north africa. How do you propose the US wipes them all out? It would be a bigger operation than the extermination of the jews, entirely unjustified and the worst crime against humanity.

Please thınk about what you say and the people ıt may offend when you make these rıdıculous comments.

quote:

Originally posted by LoveTheRainbow:
Personally I think that the threat of the Soviet Union would have been good enough to make the Japanese surrender. We should have givin it a bit more time. It would have saved a lot of innocent civilan lives.

We saved more lives by doing it then and i think that effectivly showed the world what you get if you push us. The main reason those terrorists havent tried that yet is because of the atom bombs and if they ever did try and bomb us it would be the end of the islamic religion.

Personally I think that the threat of the Soviet Union would have been good enough to make the Japanese surrender. We should have givin it a bit more time. It would have saved a lot of innocent civilan lives.