Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
quote: Originally posted by Trisscar: quote: Oh yeah... but, do we know that Bush truly knew he was lying? I know he definitely did not have proof for some stuff, but I was under the impression that he had faulty info 'cause people didn't want to give the boss bad news.
I honestly beleive the poor fool actually beleived everything he said. Really I actually feel bad for him for being so stupid.
If we could impeach people for stupidity he'd be in trouble.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: October 22, 2006
Posts: 2535
|
quote: Oh yeah... but, do we know that Bush truly knew he was lying? I know he definitely did not have proof for some stuff, but I was under the impression that he had faulty info 'cause people didn't want to give the boss bad news.
I honestly beleive the poor fool actually beleived everything he said. Really I actually feel bad for him for being so stupid.
J'irai bien.
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
quote: Originally posted by speed: now is when you question what holds more weight, an unimportant lie about one's personal life, albeit, under oath. Or an extremely important series of lies, about terrrorism and WMD's.
Gotta love Hypocrisy.
Oh yeah... but, do we know that Bush truly knew he was lying? I know he definitely did not have proof for some stuff, but I was under the impression that he had faulty info 'cause people didn't want to give the boss bad news.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: February 05, 2005
Posts: 929
|
quote: having a gay one.
impossible and we all know it. quote: lied under oath now is when you question what holds more weight, an unimportant lie about one's personal life, albeit, under oath. Or an extremely important series of lies, about terrrorism and WMD's. Gotta love Hypocrisy.
If god existed he'd be right winged
|

Registered: January 16, 2003
Posts: 12687
|
Yeah. Though I don't think her husbands history of lying is going to help her campaing. It will be interesting to see her run.
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
I don't know, it'll be interesting to see how Hilary does. I think we might be able to pull off electing a woman in the nearish future if she does well, even if she doesn't win.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: January 16, 2003
Posts: 12687
|
I think that this country has more probabilities of electing a female president then that of having a gay one. Even the chances of having a female president are low. The thing is that there are many homophobics who will never let this happen and if anyone that has a different sexual preference thinks of even running, he or she will have to hide it. This country claims to be the land of freedom from any kind of oppression, but there are still many forms of discrimination that oppress the people of this nation. How can we expect to have a woman run this country when on average women make less money for the same amount of work and education? How can we expect to have a gay president when gay marriage is such a huge contreversy and the states don't even have a unanimous opion on the subject? I don't see any of these two scenerios happening anytime soon.
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
quote: Originally posted by LoveTheRainbow: What does this have to do with War and Terrorism?
Absolutely positively nothing. But since when do people stick with topics? True clpo, but still... it's not THAT confusing.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: October 28, 2005
Posts: 5354
|
What does this have to do with War and Terrorism?
draft beer not soldiers...
|

Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6054
|
That's because both the indictment and conviction are called "impeachment". You impeach someone to bring them to trial in order to get them impeached. Very confusing.
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
That's one of the problems with how we set things up, we want a head of government and a head of state in the same person, meaning we want a moral leader and someone who can be ruthless in government at the same time. Hardly any other country asks that of their leaders. Is it just me or does hardly anybody understand how the impeachment process works?
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6054
|
Yeah, as much as some people like to think Clinton was impeached because of his affair, it was really the perjury bit. But he was never convicted, which is why he wasn't removed from office. I doubt it would have been such a big deal if people weren't so apt to see the president as this country's moral leader...
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
quote: Originally posted by speed: well clinton was almost impeached over a blowjob, whereas our current president is known to have lied about issues as preoccupying as nuclear and chemical weapons, and no one has even thought of impeachement.
Clinton lied under oath dear. While I don't think it was any of our business in the first place, he still did. And maybe Congress hasn't thought of impeachment, but other people have.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: February 05, 2005
Posts: 929
|
well clinton was almost impeached over a blowjob, whereas our current president is known to have lied about issues as preoccupying as nuclear and chemical weapons, and no one has even thought of impeachement.
If god existed he'd be right winged
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
quote: Originally posted by clpo13: Maybe we can convince a gay candidate to just not say he's gay until he's already been elected. We won't be lying. We'll just be...okay, so I'm sure someone will call it lying and get the poor sod impeached, but oh well.
Holy smokes clpo, can you even imagine how pissed people would be if somebody did that? They'd have the poor guy thrown out faster than anything. Thanks Tris, I couldn't remember (obviously) but I didn't think you all had ever voted one in... but you've had one in second in command anyway which is more than we've managed.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: October 22, 2006
Posts: 2535
|
quote: Tris, has Canada never had a women as PM
We did once, but she only got in by default because she was second in command when somebody else resigned. She was never voted in.
J'irai bien.
|

Registered: November 05, 2004
Posts: 6054
|
Maybe we can convince a gay candidate to just not say he's gay until he's already been elected. We won't be lying. We'll just be...okay, so I'm sure someone will call it lying and get the poor sod impeached, but oh well.
The more you know, the less you don't know.
|

Registered: February 27, 2003
Posts: 2217
|
Well we all (well no that's a lie) know that people SHOULD be voting for the best person for the job. The problem is that we're way to influenced by what party they're part of, how well they campaign, what religion they are, and other things that shouldn't matter. Tris, has Canada never had a women as PM?
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." Thomas Jefferson
|

Registered: June 14, 2006
Posts: 956
|
Yes, I agree, people should vote for people based on the ability to do the job (correctly mind you) not on who they love or their gender
Y to the V to the licious ... YVlicious....
|

Registered: October 22, 2006
Posts: 2535
|
I have to agree with HL there. The states really has a huge problem with gay people. Even in Canada I think its more likely for a female Prime Minister to get in than an openly gay person. Personally I don't care, if I think they're the best person for the job, I will vote for them, I don't care if they're straight, gay, white, black, chinese, mexican, or whatever race male, female, Whatever, it doesn't matter to me.
J'irai bien.
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|