YN Home  
Home Causes Boards Debate Tools Join YN!
Search YN:
 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Picture of bextherex
Registered: May 18, 2002
Posts: 1111
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
There was a documentary on channel four on British television recently called Dying for Drugs. It is probably the most disturbing and horrific programme I have ever seen and, although I know I will not be able to put this across as well as I would like, I felt compelled to post about it on YouthNOISE, as making a difference is what this site is all about.

The programme was all about the power of major drugs companies and there were several issues raised.

1) Getting volunteers to test new drugs is difficult and drugs comanies often go to developing countries to find people to give the drugs to. They use the desperation of these people during outbreaks of severe diseases to push UNTESTED drugs on them without consent. They then make the excuse that these people cannot write in English so a 'verbal consent' was taken rather than an official written one. Often children are used in these experiments.

2) There is so much money involved in developing and selling a new drug (multi-million dollar deals) that drugs companies are very keen to get new drugs on the market. If there are concerns raised about a drug AFTER it has been put on the market, companies will use downright threatening means to make sure it stays on the shelves. The programme told the story of a doctor who had strong concerns about the safety of a new drug. She had found evidence to suggest it has unwelcome side-effects causing liver damage. When she raised these concerns, she started receiving threatening letters. When she didn't back down, she was sacked from her job as an expert in her field (with claims against her that she could prove were false). Her case is not unique.

3) Threats are not just made against individuals - ok this is complicated but I'll give it a shot. Many countries follow international patenting laws on drugs that state that when a company develops a new drug, they hold the rights to that drug for 20 years, and it has to be sold at the price that they name. This means that if they are overcharging, they face no competition from other companies developing the same drug and selling it at a lower price. They can charge whatever they want, for life-saving drugs, and go unquestioned.

Some countries, like India, have patenting laws that allow companies to get around this and develop drugs at their own prices. Sure enough, some companies are able to sell good-quality, often life-saving drugs at a price vastly lower than the big pharms. They can sell pills for $1 that big pharms are charging $27 for, making them available to people who couldn't possibly affored them at the asking price of the big pharms.

But this does not look set to last long. India is being pressured to change its patenting laws so that these companies will have to sell drugs at the price names by the big pharms. An Indian politician objected to this, and was fired.

Because big pharms (big drug companies) have SO much money they have a lot of power. Their huge wealth means that they have the support of European and American governments. When countries like India are not complying to what they want, the American/European governments threaten to cut off trade with those countries. So failing to do as the big pharms dictate can threaten a country's entire economy. Their ability to threaten a country in this way means that soon there will only be a handful of massive, multi-million corporations deciding the price of drugs sold everywhere in the world.

4) Sorry this is taking so long, but finally I've got to he consequences of all this. Drug companies can charge whatever the hell they like for life saving drugs. They can make, legitimately, as much profit as they want without competition. They have a right to ask these prices, they are a business and they are selling a product. But in doing so they are putting a price on life. And they are putting vital drugs out of reach of the poorest (and consequently, often most in need) people of the world. Desperate for a drug that could save their lives, people are literally dying because they cannot afford them. The programme followed leukemia patients in China desperately campaigning for drugs that could save them, but were beyond their means. They had no effect.

The programme finished by following a 12-year-old boy in Honduras, dying of aids (there is a picture of him on the website I'll give at the bottom of this). He could not eat because aids had made him weakened to a disease which took hold in his throat. A weekly supply of tablets to get rid of the disease cost a substantial amount more than the weekly income of his whole family. He could not eat, was a walking skeleton and his family had to watch him die in front of their eyes. He died on film.

It was the most frustrating thing I have ever seen because it DOES NOT HAVE TO BE THIS WAY. These drugs can be sold, and make a profit, for so much less, but they are not, and it is all because of the greed of the big pharms. Business is business, and the aim of big businesses is to make as much profit as possible. But at the cost of human life? There are profits, there are reasonable profits, there are big profits, and there are obscene profits. No family should have to watch a loved one die and feel helpless to try and save them, for the sake of an obscene profit. Drug companies should not be able to control peoples' fate to that extent and they have to be stopped. Drugs can, and should be sold at AFFORDABLE prices. The fact that my government and the American government supports the big pharms is particularly galling… As is the corrupt means they use to make sure their position is secure The overall message I got was this: These businesses are not concerned about saving lives. They are concerned about making money, and as much of it as possible.

The channel 4 website below has information on campaigning groups and ways to help… Thanks if you read through the whole of this post, I know it's a lot of information and you have to trust me that I got it from a reliable source. I hope I was coherent and got the situation across all right.

http://www.channel4.com/health/microsites/D/dying_for_drugs/index.html

Bex
Registered: January 16, 2003
Posts: 1
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
you know, being a dad in age of 17 is so terrible. but if you think that you can do all the best for your son, to make his life better, you should try more and more. you must finish your study, then try your best to be a good father. because, your son don't have the mother beside him. so he will be very poor. dear friend, i have to tell you that your son is so wonderful that i think i love him very much. don't be fall down. brave on and try smiling. i think you will find the life is more wonderful.
Picture of bextherex
Registered: May 18, 2002
Posts: 1111
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
WELCOME, Ben!

Big Grin

This is probably the longest topic I ever wrote on this site but it didn't really get much of a reaction.

Oh well.

Bex Frown
Picture of Helios
Registered: May 04, 2003
Posts: 27
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I Caught glimpses of that program on 4 when it was on, i found it hard to beleive that even though all those people (who had ultimately been the guinea pigs) were being charged all the money for something to keep them alive!

Do the big companies have feel no guilt!

This is a very serious matter and deserves some attention, it is good to see that people are finnaly "wising up" so to speak about these problems in the world around us, and that Channel Four went to the effort of making such a program, to open our eyes to this.


(on a lighter note, this is my firts post ribbit!)
Picture of penmagic
Registered: April 22, 2002
Posts: 279
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I know most corporations are greedy, and that all they are after is profit, profit, profit- but I was shocked by this. It shows to just what extent they'll go- that a handful of people running the drugs companies will cause so many more less privelaged people to die, for the sake of making an obscene profit for themselves… It disgusts me.

And I do think this says something about people's attitudes in business. The modern business ethic is thoroughly selfish. It's all about the money… People are seen as a commodity to be leeched from, not as individuals in their own right.
Where is the conscience in the corporate world? Whatever happened to compassion and morality?
Mad
-Pen
Picture of bextherex
Registered: May 18, 2002
Posts: 1111
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
So, any opinions? What do you think of big business in general? Is it ALWAYS corrupt? Why does the possession of money allow them to get away with so much? Does there need to be a change of ideals in the whole business world? Business is, after all a part of society, but has it become immune to the moral codes that are placed on us as individual human beings? WHY are we so carried away by the promise of money and why does morality and decency go out of the window even in situations as important as human life? Do you think that enough money could make you immune to feeling guilty? Do you think that, offered millions of pounds, you could go against morals you would normally adhere to?

I spent a loong time writing about this so what do you think of the whole 'Dying for Drugs' issue? Are you shocked, or would you, in fact, expect big business to have this attitude?

Bex
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community