Scientist say that in the near future, men are most likely to produce babies, what do think about that? Wierd huh?

lol i thought of something............ would the women be on the men's bedside while he's pushin'.........lol

hey u can't stop it if its gonna happen.........if, lol

@@

never

impossable

malepregnancy.com

What website?

OK freedomordeath I went on the website, but didn't look around or anything. I just clicked right out of it.

It was sick just looking at that man standing there. I mean if it did really happen, that man is crazy.

That's all I got to say about it.

quote:

i know they are not physically capable of it (lack of body parts)

actually there are many cases of women with babies inside of them but not in the uterus, in one case on Ripley's believe it or not, there was a woman with a baby growing outside the uterus it was attached to the liver, she had a c-cection and it lived. Mind you these babies have a very low chance of survival. and if they are found in early pregnancy they are usually removed or dont make it anyway.

so if a man could be injected with a womans hormones and obviously babies do not have to be carried in the uterus who knows what can happen, now obviously a man cant concieve naturally but there is invitro and there is c-cection....

i'm sure there is something that they could come up with that could make this happen. Wouldn't doubt it if it happened.

this is the dumbest thing i've ever heard. first off, any self-respecting scientist would not publicly make this statement. it's not at all possible for men to concieve in the first place. if a scientist ever said anything like this, they would have to know their career is heading down the drain. men don't have eggs to fertilize. men don't have a uterus to provide a place for an embryo to develop. they would have to have periods and such. i can't believe this topic even got posted and that you people are talking/debating about it like it's possible. guys just don't have the equipment.

n/o to men...but i dont think that they could handle the pain. nautural birth or c-section. plus carrying the baby is a whole other story in itself! personally, i know they are not physically capable of it (lack of body parts) and i dont think that they could emotionally handle it either...sorry men...i just dont think that its for you!

read my lips ain't gonna happen. ever. or else.

Well who knows what the future may hold for men. Maybe one day they will have children.

Men can't have babies. They don't have a uterus. (There is nowhere for a fetus to develop)

The link provided by clpo says that a man having a baby will be similar to a woman with an ectopic pregnancy, which is when the egg is implanted outside of the uterus. A fetus cannot develop in an ectopic pregnancy for a variety of reasons. Women with ectopic pregnancies do not give birth. How a man is going to somehow go through with one is lost on me.
http://kidshealth.org/parent/pregnancy_newborn/pregnancy/ectopic.html

quote:

Originally posted by redrepub05:
This is not only utterly grostesque and immoral, it goes against God and His word. Females make the offspring, not the males. It is that biologically simple.

Don't talk about biology....you are one of those conservative fools, and biology is not your language

quote:

Females make the offspring, not the males.

Both Males and Females TOGETHER make the offspring. As of now, females just carry them.

quote:

it goes against God and His word.

It won't take long for you to realize...no one cares.

End of story. If I want to have a child, then by gum, I'll have a child!!!

Of course, I'm not crazy, so I won't. It hurts just thinking about it.

It reminded me of Spaceballs when the thing jumps out of that guy and dances and sings.

That'd be awesome.