Registered: April 03, 2007
Posts: 236
|
Question: Now..if someone had a 99.9% chance of dying and lived would it be considered a Miracle or just being lucky? Answer that and why do you think of that way. And then if someone had a 50% chance of dying and a 50% chance of living would THAT be considered a Miracle or just pure luck? Er ya know being lucky. Have your thoughts changed from the frist one? If so or if not tell me why. Cause I came up with this question myself, and I havent been able to answer my own question. I usauly do but I'm stumped what do you think it would be? (I know its weird to get stumped by your own question but it happened) _THANX_ P.S. I honeslty didn't know where to post this so If I put it in the wrong one (wich I probably did) Moderators pleez do move...
Oh my gosh there's a message in my cheerios, it says, OOOOOOO
|
Registered: April 03, 2007
Posts: 236
|
well yea...
Oh my gosh there's a message in my cheerios, it says, OOOOOOO
|
Registered: March 08, 2004
Posts: 1686
|
My take: if someone had a 99.9% chance of dying and lived, that would just be amazing luck. If someone had a 100% chance of dying and lived, that would be a miracle. Assuming he didn't have his math wrong. Which he did.
And then, as the books were told, Fina replied: "A can of worms, my dear friend? What has this to do with reason?"
|
Registered: May 07, 2003
Posts: 7537
|
There are only two ways to live you life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as if everything is. -Albert Einstein
"Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has." --Margaret Mead
|
Topics 
