Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|

Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
yes he should get reelected.
redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreemarketLover, Redrepublican, Jookly, and Luvabug22 and theiir endless pursuit to cst out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
|

Registered: January 23, 2004
Posts: 85
|
No i dont think Bush should be re elected! 
|

Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
damage! damage?! what damage? he has never done any damage.
redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary
for all you coalition haters out there, i am not imposing my views on anyone. i am just sharing my views like the rest of you and am trying to help people see my point.
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, Redrepublican and Jookly and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
|

Registered: August 24, 2003
Posts: 192
|
quote: Having no government would do more damage than a president.
Not if that president was Shrub. Anyway, I was just trying to make a point. And I never said no government. Just no president. There's still Congress and the House of Representatives. Neither of which has done as much damage as Shrub.
|

Registered: June 22, 2004
Posts: 24
|
quote: Personally, I am against Bush. I believe that it would be better to have no president at all than to have Bush, because at least air would do no damage.
Having no government would do more damage than a president. If I had to choose between the two, I'd choose Bush, but then again, I would choose Bush anyway.
|

Registered: August 24, 2003
Posts: 192
|
quote: I think nushoes makes a valid point. If all of the drugees were in prison, they couldnt swarm to the ghettos, now could they?!?
Thanks for that, Bushsupporter. This is exactly why I am not a Republican. They believe that everyone who does anything wrong should be tossed in jail! Sure, I don't want our streets to be overrun with druggies either, but whatever happened to rehabilitation?! Discipline and consequences are not everything; just a part of the answer. If a murderer is caught, why should he automatically get the death sentence? Because this is what Republicans are arguing for. If we kill the murderer, what does that make us?! MURDERERS!!! Personally, I am against Bush. I believe that it would be better to have no president at all than to have Bush, because at least air would do no damage. 
|

Registered: December 19, 2002
Posts: 1708
|
I am not a Bush fan but I am even less of a Kerry fan. I am just frustrated about this election. It's like I am being asked to choose my execution method. The reason I would pick Bush over Kerry is because at least Bush has a plan. Sure I don't agree with every aspect of what he believes but I certainly can't agree with Kerry because noone ever knows what he actually believes!
So Yes. I think Bush should be elected again. He has a plan and he has conviction to his morals. I respect him as the current president and would be glad to do so for another 4 years.
|

Registered: June 24, 2004
Posts: 12
|
i pray to god that bush will not win this next election. it must be hard to be leader of this country, with so many different ppl and all that, but he could have dine better. as i see it he has done notthing to try and do something about the problems that are alive and kickin. he has just tryed to stop love to a man and a man or a woman and a woman. i think that kerry will a breath of fresh air, or any of the ppl that are running. any of them but bush.
|

Registered: April 18, 2004
Posts: 65
|
Im saying this loud and clear Bush sux A$$!!!!! I dont like him I DONT like what he has 'tryed' or done for this country. And I think he is full of it! Oh yes if your 18 or older and you have read this PLEASE dont vote for him on election day! 
|

Registered: January 18, 2003
Posts: 1110
|
quote: If all of the drugees were in prison, they couldnt swarm to the ghettos, now could they?!?
We are going to play the if-game now? What if there were no ghettos? They couldn't swarm the ghettos if there weren’t any? I could name off a million if-scenarios but of course the probability of these actually HAPPENINIG is unlikely just like the PROBABILITY of ALL the drug users being in jail is unlikely. Not to mention you put fourth an utterly useless statement. If all the drug users were in jail, of course they couldn't swarm the ghettos; it is implied from your premise. Simply nushoes statement is a oversimplification. While I can't dispute the possibility of liberals *potentially affecting this part of society in the manner suggested, it is an oversimplification to imply that liberals are they only effect in the scenario; just like it is an oversimplification to imply that Bush is the only effect *Don’t misinterpret this as a rhetorical ploy; I was simply using the word potentially to keep the argument objective.
|

Registered: September 19, 2001
Posts: 2202
|
I think nushoes makes a valid point. If all of the drugees were in prison, they couldnt swarm to the ghettos, now could they?!?
-President Bushsupporter, ESQ.
"Freedom is not Free"-Korean War Memorial, Washington DC.
*This post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE*
|

Registered: June 09, 2003
Posts: 5084
|
I think the world should become an Anarchy. It would solve all our problems. ("And send them back to the Abyss from whence they came!" the wavemaster cries, brandishing a sword before him.)
|

Registered: January 18, 2003
Posts: 1110
|
quote: They swarm the ghettos because the Democrats are so soft on crime, and Democrats have been in power in most states, not to mention 8 years of recent presidency and four decades of Congress.
Oh come on nushoes, thats a little bit of stretch don’t you think. While I disagree with you on most issues I wouldn't expect you to go to this.
|

Registered: October 22, 2002
Posts: 1068
|
quote: Drugs violence and gangs swarm the ghettoes
They swarm the ghettos because the Democrats are so soft on crime, and Democrats have been in power in most states, not to mention 8 years of recent presidency and four decades of Congress.
|
|
Registered: July 03, 2003
Posts: 4
|
HELL NAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bush has done nothing for us. He too busy trying to get a war started. Congratz you started a war, and you know what a lot of innocent people are dying thinking their making a difference. In my eyes we are still fighting a war in the United States. It's in the streets we live in. Children getting abducted being raped and killed. Now just cause you ain't gettin none at home don't do this to these children you know what I mean! Drugs violence and gangs swarm the ghettoes I children don't have a place to go that they can say they can make themselves a postitive person. So yall think on that. Bush a lil whimp who need to get beat down. He ain't a leader. Clinton should be in the white house again he did what he could to make America a comfortable place for anybody to live in. null
|

Registered: April 24, 2003
Posts: 2196
|
Yup.
|
|
Registered: June 25, 2004
Posts: 62
|
he should be elected again
|

Registered: December 11, 2003
Posts: 9501
|
nope, bush should go and hide in a secluded crater in the moon when he's no longer prez before some crazy terrorist shoots him.
|

Registered: June 09, 2003
Posts: 5084
|
1. I'm not democrat, so you can't use that against me.. not that you did. I'm just the sabotoging kinda person... 2. unhonest?
|

Registered: April 24, 2003
Posts: 2196
|
quote: I wonder if I can sabatoge my parents' votes.
And it's the republicans that get blamed for being unhonest...
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|