Go  |
New |
Find |
Notify |
|
Reply |
|
Admin |
New PM! |
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
whoever said this? Bush never said this. no one ever said this.
this is just another sad attempt by the biased media to demonize bush. although their attempts are becoming more and more pathetic.
it doesnt even demonize him.
another thing. how come nothing was ever shown about Clinton's and Gore's session with the commission or the review?
because the media didnot want to disclose that information to teh American public.
Al-Qaeda said after the first WWTC bombings that they would be back and those buildings would come down. Bush had eight months to do somthing. Eight months. eight months is a very short time to launch any campaign against terrorism.
Clinton and Gore had eight YEARS! eight years! they did nothing to stop it.
as it becomes more and more clear, it is Iran that is fraternizing with Al-Qaeda. Iran will not cooperate peacefully. i know they wont.
that was never one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq however. it was never a factor that Iraq had relations with Al-Qaeda.
i think America should support the revolution in Iran.
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Honorable Coaltiotn of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their enldess pursuit ot cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
|
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
quote:
Originally posted by JoeyDauben:
Of course there was a Iraqi-al Qaeda link. If anyone would study real history, you could clearly see the Iraqi-terrorist links in the OKC bombing of 1995 and the 1993 WTC attack.
It's all obvious.
And it all has one link: the CIA.
The CIA trains, funds and arms our enemies, so yes, there was a link.
im sorry maybe you misspelled or somthing. funded our enemies ehh? elaborate please. Bush/Cheney '04 Vice President Redrepublican Esq., Co-Founding Father this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Honorable Coalition of Bushsuporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreMarketLover, redrepublican, Jookly, RepublicanChick, and TruthfullySpeaking and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE. |
<JoeyDauben>
|
Of course there was a Iraqi-al Qaeda link. If anyone would study real history, you could clearly see the Iraqi-terrorist links in the OKC bombing of 1995 and the 1993 WTC attack.
It's all obvious.
And it all has one link: the CIA.
The CIA trains, funds and arms our enemies, so yes, there was a link.
|
Registered: July 13, 2004
Posts: 19
|
One major tie that Iraq has with Al-Queda is rarely publicized becuase leftest are trying to make Bush look like the enemy. This over looked tie is the Nasiriyah (Al-Queda) training camp near Al-Fallujah. Not only was the training camp in Iraq, but it was also sponsered by the iraqi goverenment.
|
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
quote:
Originally posted by maharini15:
No. red, you're not right. The torture thing (and yes, I mean TORTURE) hasn't been in media spotlight because they want to demonize bush. Calling attacks under one president proof that he was a "p i s s poor president" while having them under bush proves he's truly valiant, isn't right. It's not right that we only step up for the little guy when it's better for us. And, finally, it's not right that we get mad at a country for violating a UN agreement and then disobey the UN. I dunno whether you're a bigoted racist or not, but you're pretty friggin biased against Iraqis and Palestinians. I'm going to attempt to stop replying, we've kindof resorted to the point where we're both restating the same thing.
when i wrote this i wasnt talking to you. i was talking to illuminatrix. there were four or five terrorist attacks committed by terrorists (duh) and Clinton did nothing to stop it. when the first bombing of the WTC in 1993 happened and those towers didnt fall, those terrorists said that they would be back to bring it down. clinton did nothing to stop it. he did not create any measures to protect American citizens. he did not create a homeland security dept., which by the way has done its job very well. he pursued his own interests instead of doing his job. his presidency was a wasted opportunity. do you know what those warnings of terrorist atacs aer? they are really general in where it will take place and teh time. do you really think usama would have told us where and whent there was going to be an atack? and when 911 did happen, he reacted right away and very wisely. He handled the situation well. How was it better for us? in a way it was but dont you see? liberals yell at bush for liberating other countries in the world instead of doing his job in America. and now you say that we went in there to benefit ourselves? we did acutally but it benefitted the world and Iraqi people immensley and more so too. how am i biased about Iraqis and palestinians? is it because i care for them just as i care for the rest of teh world? i dont hate arabs in case you were wondering. i dont hate any people group just because. They violated an agreement and teh Un would not let us enforce it. if we do not enforce laws, then it undermines the enitre point of the agreement in the first place. thats like saying you cannot chew gum in school. say someone violates it. well you give them another chance. they do it again. what are you supposed to do? give them more leniency? i dont think so. If teachers didnt enforce taht law, then students would know that they could keep pressing their luck. what was the point of teh "no gum" rule in the first place? same goes for Iraq. in fact we gave them two chances. one in the seventies when we asked him to give up his WMDs and then again in '91 when we kicked him out of Kuwait. We had been negotiating with Saddam throughout his entire presidency. If we do not enforce rules, then what are the point of them in the first place? -redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless prusuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE. |
Registered: August 14, 2003
Posts: 116
|
"no you wont reply becasue i have backed you into a corner. you wont rply becasue you know i am right. i am not a bigoted racist! that statement falls with lack of evidence.
-Redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Hoorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out teh bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE."
No. red, you're not right. The torture thing (and yes, I mean TORTURE) hasn't been in media spotlight because they want to demonize bush. Calling attacks under one president proof that he was a "p i s s poor president" while having them under bush proves he's truly valiant, isn't right. It's not right that we only step up for the little guy when it's better for us. And, finally, it's not right that we get mad at a country for violating a UN agreement and then disobey the UN. I dunno whether you're a bigoted racist or not, but you're pretty friggin biased against Iraqis and Palestinians. I'm going to attempt to stop replying, we've kindof resorted to the point where we're both restating the same thing.
|
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
quote:
Originally posted by CelticNewAger:
quote:
wrong. we are a "superpower" because we have more than 2600 more than any other country. we believe we can do what we like because we have the bigger guns. Supporting Israel has nothing to do with our "superpowers." actually, we only use our "surpluspowers" to help israel in their terrorism against palestine. this is a completely different topic, which i'll be glad to talk about later on.
Yep, there is a theory in the U.S. that f you can shoot someone with a bigger gun or something, then you're better. Which is taken very seriously by Americans, considering how they just enter a country that's none of their business. Oh hell, the world is a copey of high school.
we do not go into countries that have that are none of our business! saddaam violateed teh agreement of no WMDs so we enforced it. mark my words. the day we stop supporting Israel is the day we crumble. hopefully we can get North Korea to disarm. -Redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Hoorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out teh bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE. |
Registered: December 11, 2003
Posts: 9501
|
quote:
wrong. we are a "superpower" because we have more than 2600 more than any other country. we believe we can do what we like because we have the bigger guns. Supporting Israel has nothing to do with our "superpowers." actually, we only use our "surpluspowers" to help israel in their terrorism against palestine. this is a completely different topic, which i'll be glad to talk about later on.
Yep, there is a theory in the U.S. that f you can shoot someone with a bigger gun or something, then you're better. Which is taken very seriously by Americans, considering how they just enter a country that's none of their business. Oh hell, the world is a copey of high school. |
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
quote:
Originally posted by Illuminatrix:
alright, you know what? i give up. it's clear you don't want your mind changed, let alone learn something. you're opinionated, and bigotted like the majority of the other users on this site. you just set up this wall so you can't be open to anything that might change your mind. i suppose it's easier to be scared of knowledge than to actually use it.
you won't find me replying to this post again.
no you wont reply becasue i have backed you into a corner. you wont rply becasue you know i am right. i am not a bigoted racist! that statement falls with lack of evidence. -Redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Hoorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out teh bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE. |
Registered: June 16, 2004
Posts: 91
|
alright, you know what? i give up. it's clear you don't want your mind changed, let alone learn something. you're opinionated, and bigotted like the majority of the other users on this site. you just set up this wall so you can't be open to anything that might change your mind. i suppose it's easier to be scared of knowledge than to actually use it.
you won't find me replying to this post again.
|
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Illuminatrix:
"i've done mine. the bomb didn't go off, not at least like how they expected it to. the terrorists involved were killed instantly, and no other terrorist group claimed responsibility. it sure as hell blew up the truck, but only about 25% of the plastique went off. check your spelling too, a s s h o l e."
are we even taling about the same attack? well maybe we werent because there so many damn attacks under that p i s s poor president.
"wrong. we are a "superpower" because we have more than 2600 more than any other country. we believe we can do what we like because we have the bigger guns. Supporting Israel has nothing to do with our "superpowers." actually, we only use our "surpluspowers" to help israel in their terrorism against palestine. this is a completely different topic, which i'll be glad to talk about later on."
youll see that if we ever stop suporting Israel, we wil fall.
"nad like i said before, the only "collaborating" the Baathis party and Al Qaeda have done is signing a treaty of neutrality, thus agreeing not to attack each other. do your ******* research."
Do yours! Did you read Vladimir Putin's report? his intel found that saddam was either planning attacks on the US or he had a hand in 911. Did you read the Zelikow report? That went against all evidence of contacts between Usama and Saddam too.
"nononono...... when the Mujahadeen fought the russians, it was (to the best of my knowledge) either carter or ford. not regan. it was in the damn seventies. Afghanistan hit the world's headlines in 1979. Afghanistan seemed to perfectly summarise the ColdWar. From the west's point of view, Berlin, Korea, Hungary and Cuba had shown the way communism wanted to proceed. Afghanistan was a continuation of this.
In Christmas 1979, Russian paratroopers landed in Kabal, the capital of Afghanistan. The country was already in the grip of a civil war. The prime minister, Hazifullah Amin, tried to sweep aside Muslim tradition within the nation and he wanted a more western slant to Afghanistan. This outraged the majority of those in Afghanistan as a strong tradition of Muslim belief was common in the country.
Thousands of Muslim leaders had been arrested and many more had fled the capital and gone to the mountains to escape Amin's police. Amin also lead a communist based government - a belief that rejects religion and this was another reason for such obvious discontent with his government.
Thousands of Afghanistan Muslims joined the Mujahdeen - a guerilla force on a holy mission for Allah. They wanted the overthrow of the Amin government. The Mujahdeen declared a jihad - a holy war - on the supporters of Amin. This was also extended to the Russians who were now in Afghanistan trying to maintain the power of the Amin government. The Russians claimed that they had been invited in by the Amin government and that they were not invading the country. They claimed that their task was to support a legitimate government and that the Mujahdeen were no more than terrorists.
On December 27th, 1979, Amin was shot by the Russians and he was replaced by Babrak Kamal. His position as head of the Afghan government depended entirely on the fact that he needed Russian military support to keep him in power. Many Afghan soldiers had deserted to the Mujahdeen and the Kamal government needed 85,000 Russian soldiers to keep him in power.
The Mujahdeen proved to be a formidable opponent. They were equipped with old rifles but had a knowledge of the mountains around Kabal and the weather conditions that would be encountered there. The Russians resorted to using napalm, poison gas and helicopter gun ships against the Mujahdeen - but they experienced exactly the same military scenario the Americans had done in Vietnam.
By 1982, the Mujahdeen controlled 75% of Afghanistan despite fighting the might of the world's second most powerful military power. Young conscript Russian soldiers were no match against men fuelled by their religious belief. Though the Russian army had a reputation, the war in Afghanistan showed the world just how poor it was outside of military displays. Army boots lasted no more than 10 days before falling to bits in the harsh environment of the Afghanistan mountains. Many Russian soldiers deserted to the Mujahdeen. Russian tanks were of little use in the mountain passes.
The United Nations had condemned the invasion as early as January 1980 but a Security Council motion calling for the withdrawal of Russian forces had been vetoed......by Russia.
i've done my research, and it's right there to prove it. where's yours?"
i think what you did was give me a detailed lesson of somthing that i knew. what are you trying to prove? The Afghan War went on from 1979 to 1989. it was ten years.
-Redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsuporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
[This message was edited by YNLissa on June 25, 2004 at 05:22 AM.]
|
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
"The media have been focused on the torture scandal because...it was a case when America, the heads of whom have been denouncing torture and claiming that the U.S. was a more civilized country, tortured its prisoners and hid them from the Red Cross. That is, after all, important news."
but we all know it is a bad thing. but dont you think eight months is enough???
"Donald Rumsfeld, when asked exactly what orders he gave the officers in Iraq, and what orders they gave to the heads of that prison, did not respond. Bush said on an interview "I have never condoned torture" and there are memos he signed in which he decided to waive the Geneva Convention, protecting against torture. It's being pursued because it's rapidly appearing that people at the very top of the government actually knew about the torture, and that, frankly, is disturbing."
HE IS NOT GOING TO TORTURE THEM! Even the Abu Ghraib scandal goons didnt torture the prisoners. they just extremely humiliated them.
"Yes, the economy is important - however, ANY media source is less likely to focus on the economy when its movement is gradual than human rights issues."
The economy is rebounding aat a record pace as nushoesagain said. And they have not said ne ting about it.
-Redrepublican Esq., HIS Secretary
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsuporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
|
Registered: June 16, 2004
Posts: 91
|
quote:
you know my overall arguement is flawless. im talking about 1994 when the bomb went of in the basement of one of the WTCs and killed two pwople. DO YOUR RESEARCH!.
i've done mine. the bomb didn't go off, not at least like how they expected it to. the terrorists involved were killed instantly, and no other terrorist group claimed responsibility. it sure as hell blew up the truck, but only about 25% of the plastique went off. check your spelling too, a s s h o l e. quote:
heh they were secular but that doenst mean that they didnt like the baathist political agenda. they have been collaboating. and do you have any idea why our country is like it is? its because our founders and early settlers were Christian. We are a superpower because we support Israel.
wrong. we are a "superpower" because we have more than 2600 more than any other country. we believe we can do what we like because we have the bigger guns. Supporting Israel has nothing to do with our "superpowers." actually, we only use our "surpluspowers" to help israel in their terrorism against palestine. this is a completely different topic, which i'll be glad to talk about later on. nad like i said before, the only "collaborating" the Baathis party and Al Qaeda have done is signing a treaty of neutrality, thus agreeing not to attack each other. do your ******* research. quote:
idiot! what was Regan supposed to do? attack Osama when he was in grade school? The taliban werent even around in the seventies and eighties they were known as teh Muja-Hadeen and we gave them weapons to fend off Russia. But unfortunately they became taliban and they openly support terrorism. what the ****? all of this was perkalating in the nineties. how could clinton not know about it what with the African-American Embassy bombings, the Khobar Towers, the WTC bombings and teh USS Cole bombings. he was given so many chances so many provocations to stop terrorism and he did nothing but start some sad *** war in Kosovo. it would be unfair...no it wouldnt... it was his fault! all of his fault! no one elses. if we had some conservative president instead of Clinton all of this could ahve been stopped. dont you understand? his presidency was a waste of missed opportunities. oh the governement knoew somthing. Clinton knew somthing.
you know what those God damn terrorist attack warnings are dont you? they are really general onthe location and general on the date so it was impossible to tell when and where and how the terrorist attacks would have occurred.
nononono...... when the Mujahadeen fought the russians, it was (to the best of my knowledge) either carter or ford. not regan. it was in the damn seventies. Afghanistan hit the world's headlines in 1979. Afghanistan seemed to perfectly summarise the ColdWar. From the west's point of view, Berlin, Korea, Hungary and Cuba had shown the way communism wanted to proceed. Afghanistan was a continuation of this. In Christmas 1979, Russian paratroopers landed in Kabal, the capital of Afghanistan. The country was already in the grip of a civil war. The prime minister, Hazifullah Amin, tried to sweep aside Muslim tradition within the nation and he wanted a more western slant to Afghanistan. This outraged the majority of those in Afghanistan as a strong tradition of Muslim belief was common in the country. Thousands of Muslim leaders had been arrested and many more had fled the capital and gone to the mountains to escape Amin's police. Amin also lead a communist based government - a belief that rejects religion and this was another reason for such obvious discontent with his government. Thousands of Afghanistan Muslims joined the Mujahdeen - a guerilla force on a holy mission for Allah. They wanted the overthrow of the Amin government. The Mujahdeen declared a jihad - a holy war - on the supporters of Amin. This was also extended to the Russians who were now in Afghanistan trying to maintain the power of the Amin government. The Russians claimed that they had been invited in by the Amin government and that they were not invading the country. They claimed that their task was to support a legitimate government and that the Mujahdeen were no more than terrorists. On December 27th, 1979, Amin was shot by the Russians and he was replaced by Babrak Kamal. His position as head of the Afghan government depended entirely on the fact that he needed Russian military support to keep him in power. Many Afghan soldiers had deserted to the Mujahdeen and the Kamal government needed 85,000 Russian soldiers to keep him in power. The Mujahdeen proved to be a formidable opponent. They were equipped with old rifles but had a knowledge of the mountains around Kabal and the weather conditions that would be encountered there. The Russians resorted to using napalm, poison gas and helicopter gun ships against the Mujahdeen - but they experienced exactly the same military scenario the Americans had done in Vietnam. By 1982, the Mujahdeen controlled 75% of Afghanistan despite fighting the might of the world's second most powerful military power. Young conscript Russian soldiers were no match against men fuelled by their religious belief. Though the Russian army had a reputation, the war in Afghanistan showed the world just how poor it was outside of military displays. Army boots lasted no more than 10 days before falling to bits in the harsh environment of the Afghanistan mountains. Many Russian soldiers deserted to the Mujahdeen. Russian tanks were of little use in the mountain passes. The United Nations had condemned the invasion as early as January 1980 but a Security Council motion calling for the withdrawal of Russian forces had been vetoed......by Russia. i've done my research, and it's right there to prove it. where's yours? [This message was edited by YNLissa on June 25, 2004 at 05:22 AM.] |
Registered: August 14, 2003
Posts: 116
|
quote:
Originally posted by redrepublican:
Abu Graib scandal eight months. Nick Berg beheading one or two days. they had been on that prison scandal stroy so much because it demonizes Bush. What about teh rest of the beheadings? not more than three days. THe Federal Boevernment just relaesed huundreds of secret documents explaining the actions of the war and such. The economy in the next month or to maybe too hot and inflation occurs here ill bring up one of my topics for you to lookat its called "Economy: America's Toilet?" look at that.
this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
The media have been focused on the torture scandal because...it was a case when America, the heads of whom have been denouncing torture and claiming that the U.S. was a more civilized country, tortured its prisoners and hid them from the Red Cross. That is, after all, important news. Donald Rumsfeld, when asked exactly what orders he gave the officers in Iraq, and what orders they gave to the heads of that prison, did not respond. Bush said on an interview "I have never condoned torture" and there are memos he signed in which he decided to waive the Geneva Convention, protecting against torture. It's being pursued because it's rapidly appearing that people at the very top of the government actually knew about the torture, and that, frankly, is disturbing. Yes, the economy is important - however, ANY media source is less likely to focus on the economy when its movement is gradual than human rights issues. |
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
"what the hell? the first bombings? what do you mean the first bombing? the guy in 1997 drove a truck into the basement and was stopped before he could detonate the thing. and secondly, there were no bombs involved in the attcks on september eleventh (i'm refusing to call that horrible date in history by just a simple name like "911")."
you know my overall arguement is flawless. im talking about 1994 when the bomb went of in the basement of one of the WTCs and killed two pwople. DO YOUR RESEARCH!.
"..somebody hasn't done their research...
there was never any tie between the two governments. The taliban didn't like the Bathis party because the Bathists were secular (that means non-religious for all you uneducated republicans out there reading this). The Taliban is well known for being Muslim fundamentalists, and applying their religion's laws into government (like ours!). the only tie they had with each other was in the early nineties: a written agreement to not attack each other."
heh they were secular but that doenst mean that they didnt like the baathist political agenda. they have been collaboating. and do you have any idea why our country is like it is? its because our founders and early settlers were Christian. We are a superpower because we support Israel.
"now i will admit that there were things we could do to stop this, but none of it happned under clinton or bush. this could have easily been stopped after the end of the russian invasion in the cold war. past that there was no way we could see it coming until late 2000. i don't blame bush for the attcks, and i won't say that it happened under his watch. but i will say that the government did know something, and refused to release it."
idiot! what was Regan supposed to do? attack Osama when he was in grade school? The taliban werent even around in the seventies and eighties they were known as teh Muja-Hadeen and we gave them weapons to fend off Russia. But unfortunately they became taliban and they openly support terrorism. what the ****? all of this was perkalating in the nineties. how could clinton not know about it what with the African-American Embassy bombings, the Khobar Towers, the WTC bombings and teh USS Cole bombings. he was given so many chances so many provocations to stop terrorism and he did nothing but start some sad *** war in Kosovo. it would be unfair...no it wouldnt... it was his fault! all of his fault! no one elses. if we had some conservative president instead of Clinton all of this could ahve been stopped. dont you understand? his presidency was a waste of missed opportunities. oh the governement knoew somthing. Clinton knew somthing.
you know what those God damn terrorist attack warnings are dont you? they are really general onthe location and general on the date so it was impossible to tell when and where and how the terrorist attacks would have occurred.
"let's just put this topic to rest, and use it as another reason why we shouldn't re-elect bush."
you mean another thread to support bush and to prove the ignorance of sickening liberals.
this post has proudly been deemd racism free by the Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, marine 16, notsojoey, FreemarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE.
|
Registered: June 16, 2004
Posts: 91
|
quote:
Al-Qaeda said after the first WWTC bombings that they would be back and those buildings would come down. Bush had eight months to do somthing. Eight months. eight months is a very short time to launch any campaign against terrorism.
what the hell? the first bombings? what do you mean the first bombing? the guy in 1997 drove a truck into the basement and was stopped before he could detonate the thing. and secondly, there were no bombs involved in the attcks on september eleventh (i'm refusing to call that horrible date in history by just a simple name like "911"). quote:
Clinton and Gore had eight YEARS! eight years! they did nothing to stop it.
as it becomes more and more clear, it is Iran that is fraternizing with Al-Qaeda. Iran will not cooperate peacefully. i know they wont.
that was never one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq however. it was never a factor that Iraq had relations with Al-Qaeda.
..somebody hasn't done their research... there was never any tie between the two governments. The taliban didn't like the Bathis party because the Bathists were secular (that means non-religious for all you uneducated republicans out there reading this). The Taliban is well known for being Muslim fundamentalists, and applying their religion's laws into government (like ours!). the only tie they had with each other was in the early nineties: a written agreement to not attack each other. now i will admit that there were things we could do to stop this, but none of it happned under clinton or bush. this could have easily been stopped after the end of the russian invasion in the cold war. past that there was no way we could see it coming until late 2000. i don't blame bush for the attcks, and i won't say that it happened under his watch. but i will say that the government did know something, and refused to release it. let's just put this topic to rest, and use it as another reason why we shouldn't re-elect bush. |
Registered: June 04, 2004
Posts: 3535
|
quote:
Originally posted by maharini15:
They have NOT been demonizing bush - during the war, when they could have been questioning the evidence on which the U.S. was making its decisions, they sat quietly and regailed every miniscule detail that the U.S. government gave them. Maybe the media isn't focusing on how the economy that recently plummeted is making a gradual rise because they're focusing on the fact that Bush accepted advice from the Justice Department that the Geneva Conventions governing treatment of prisoners of war did not apply to al Qaeda or Taliban detainees captured in Afghanistan. Give the media some time to get over the CIA's refusal to hand over documents, and they'll get around to the slowly improving economy. Don't worry, I'm sure Bush will bring it up in time for the campaign.
Abu Graib scandal eight months. Nick Berg beheading one or two days. they had been on that prison scandal stroy so much because it demonizes Bush. What about teh rest of the beheadings? not more than three days. THe Federal Boevernment just relaesed huundreds of secret documents explaining the actions of the war and such. The economy in the next month or to maybe too hot and inflation occurs here ill bring up one of my topics for you to lookat its called "Economy: America's Toilet?" look at that. this post has proudly been deemed racism free by teh Honorable Coalition of Bushsupporter, Marine 16, notsojoey, FreeMarketLover, and Redrepublican and their endless pursuit to cast out the bigotry that has infiltrated youthNOISE. |
Registered: August 14, 2003
Posts: 116
|
quote:
Originally posted by redrepublican:
what would things at wal mart make difference? everything that they stock is outsourced. they so have been demonizing Bush! name one thing that they had to say about the war that was good. and dont say that there hasnt been any because there has. oh but it makes a difference when they are biased and skip over the good things that he has done. Jobs are the last thing to recover in any economic recovery. and they have been on the rise for last couple of months and will continue to rise for months to come. they have not been reporting it. when "Clinton's" economy was booming, it was all over Time Magazine, New York Times and all the other liberlas media sources. Tell me why this isnt happening now? not only is it an electi | |
