Nader is on in only seven states, and that's as the Reform Party's nominee.

Bush and Kerry both will escalate the war, will more than likely call a military draft, and basically, put the interests of their corporate puppet string-pullers above us, students, young people and taxpayers.

Michael Badnarik is our only hope, and visiting Badnarik.org to see his TV ads - currently running in New Mexico where he is polling 5 percent - would be a refreshing site to see; Badnarik will be on ballots in 49 states (unless Oklahoma straightens up its act) this year, compared to only 22 for Constitution Party nominee Michael Peroutka and Nader (seven).

Spread the word about the ONLY anti-war candidate that will have a real chance!

http://www.badnarik.org

How'd that badnarik thing work out for ya? lol

i sort of agree with you Joey.... but his chances of being elected are like my chances moving the Hymalayas to Puerto Rico

FreeMarket, you're a fascist and ignorant.

Bush just OKed the elections observers from a European organization to monitor the 2004 vote;

Bush will let expire the exemption of U.S. military personnel to be subject to Intl Crim. Court war crimes.

Bush has favored the UN taking over in Iraq; NATO is already heading up the Afghanistan operation.

A vote for either Bush or Kerry will result in the same thing, just that JFK will speed it up a few notches.

Some people will never learn.

Oh, and your U.N. skull thing is stupid. I'm not wild about the U.N. but give me a frickin break joey. this is just one more reason why so few of us take you seriously. The real danger in this election is the international criminal court which President Bush says he won't join and Senator Kerry says he will. There won't be a draft or a one world order. If you care about soveirngty than you will vote for Bush

If you really want people to vote for bad-neck-ache than you should stop talking. everytime you post I lose one more slice of respect for libertarians.