John Kerry looks like another warmed-over "Slick Willie" Clinton...weed-smoking anti-war activist after his return from Vietnam...photo taken with Hanoi Jane...voting record matches Ted Kennedy, the Hero of Chappaquiddick...twice married to rich heiresses, while claiming to be the champion of the downtrodden...rumors of an affair with an intern...

What's next?

If Bush loses, it'll be only because he has almost completely alienated his conservative base - which is never a good idea for a Republican. That base will make you or break you politically.

quote:

---

I think it is fair to he is schizophrenic. Or the world’s biggest walking contradiction.

---

Sorry to nitpick, but were you looking for Multiple Personality Disorder? Schizophrenia just doesn't seem to fit that context.

You know, many doctors and scientists don't believe MPD is even real, but I think I may have had it at one point. It was really strange.

*wanders out of thread*

Your personal life isn't the only aspect of the presidency that influences your crediblity as a leader, and far from being the only aspect, it is probably the least important one doofus.

Thats pretty weak as far as ad hominems go I suppose.

cathloc... methodist... buddist... satanist... agnostic... who the **** cares. all that matters about bush is that he's a lesbian, and as we now know, that makes him evil.

Clinton=Impeached=No Credibility as a Leader.

That's what happens when the leader loses the moral high ground.

Go back to sleep.

Still running away from actual policy that has an effect on the country.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ComradeSmurf:
So sad that, with all the REAL arguments you CAN make against Clinton, all you can come up with is sex.

---

The President of the United States using his position to get extra-marital sex with a young intern--inside the taxpayer funded Oval Office-- isn't a "real" argument???

WHAT A BUFFOON!

White Trash in the White House. That will always be Clinton's legacy.

You're sad, Smurfy. Go back to surfing your porn sites.

quote:

---

He had to replace the alcohol with the jesus.

---

What is it "the jesus" is replacing for John Kerry then?

So sad that, with all the REAL arguments you CAN make against Clinton, all you can come up with is sex.

1. He's crazy.

2. He's a christian conservative. He had to replace the alcohol with the jesus.

Oh.. well one of the Bush's is a Catholic. Might be Jebb?

Korith: What? Bush is a methodist! He is definitely not Catholic. Where did you get this idea?

Both Bush and Kerry are Catholic.

Kerry's next move:

"I am a Catholic, But I don't believe in God!"

[This message was edited by Korith on February 25, 2004 at 11:19 AM.]

A "crazy Christian conservative"? C'mon, you can do better than that, huh?

I guess you liked the lying, adulterous Slick Willie that came before Bush, huh? The kind of 53-year-old Presidink that received ********, numerous times, from a 22-year-old intern, in the Oval Office, while the First (Cuckolded) Lady was upstairs?? Oh, that's right--it was "only sex", so what was the big deal, huh??

Kerry is of the same ilk as Slick Willie. Morally and ethically bankrupt, he'll do and say anything to get elected. Like the thread topic: a Left Wing freak show. However, Kerry has a distinct, undeniable voting record that will slam him in due time...hopefully the Republican attack dogs will disembowel him into a stuttering, thumb-sucking left-wing liberal that he is.

The one thing that is particularly galling is that he claims, like fat Chappaquiddick Teddy, to be a champion of the poor and downtrodden and a hater of the rich elites.

THE TRUTH: Kerry is a fortune seeker who married two mega-rich heiresses (the first one didn't work out so he hooked the Heinz Ketchup babe), lives in a multi-million dollar mansion in Georgetown, and is so hoity-toity it ain't funny.

Questions?

quote:

---

For example, voting on something that most senators are voting for, so he can avoid being in a unpopular grouping, but still try to rationalize himself out of it.

---

This is Bull Comrade. If you are against something, then you don't vote for it because everyone else is voting for it. What kind of sense does that make? That isn't politics at all.

Kerry SUPPORTED (stop trying to double talk it Smurf, he put his name to it, he gave it his support) the war in Iraq. So he just a responsible for:

quote:

---

the respect for the United States that the rest of the World had, but was lost by Bush

---

How dopes someone justify their actions by saying, "Well everyone else was voting, Yes...."
There is a Republican majority, are you telling me if we keep a republican Marjory in the Senate, then the liberals are just going vote with us, because voting no looks bad?

Your cartoon, Korith, while mildly stupid, is still on to something. Yes, Kerry is definitely a politician, he will do politician things. For example, voting on something that most senators are voting for, so he can avoid being in a unpopular grouping, but still try to rationalize himself out of it. But still, he has a fairly good liberal voting record over his Senate career. He's not perfect, he's not even the idealistically best Democratic candidate.

However, Kerry would earn back some of the respect for the United States that the rest of the World had, but was lost by Bush. If any of you actually REMEMBER September 11th, you might recall how much support, even how much LOVE most of the rest of the world had for the United States. Europeans were crying for us, having moments of silence for us. There was real support, real emotion.

Bush wasted all of that support. Go Him. Kerry hasn't even been nominated yet, and the rest of the World already can't wait to have him the President of the United States.

Seriously, the number one issue IS defeating Bush. The idea is not to just jump out for the candidate who is bright eyed and wonderful, as nice as that would be. We need to prove that Americans don't need, don't want a crazy christian conservative like Bush in the White House. If we can keep electing John Kerrys, then perhaps we can start electing Democratic Senates. And when we start NOT electing Republicans, we don't even have to neccesarily elect Democrats. A three-party system with Greens, Social Democrats/Labour and Democrats? That's right, Democrats on the right, Labour on the left, and Greens ahead. I don't expect it in my life time, but with time, perhaps we can cure the disease of the American Right.

John Kerry: The war criminal.

He's a politician and does what is politically expedient ... you know like promising to send people to Mars.

No one is a ****ing good choice. Deal with it.

I completly agree with you. I was about to post this actually.

Supported the War in Iraq, and opposed.
Supported the Patriot Act, and opposed.
Supported the Bush Tax Cuts, and opposed....

I think it is fair to he is schizophrenic. Or the world’s biggest walking contradiction.
No wonder no one is voting for him because of “Issues”.