Registered: December 28, 2004
Posts: 15
|
Hey evereyone, Toucan here. my question is why should one person have total control of such a big place? I mean its not fair i understand why we have laws but what happened to trust? Why cant we all be ourselves? i mean its bad enough that Bush is in command but why is everything so bad now a-days like all the rapes and gangs you see around town! It was never like this in the 80's everyone was happy then and look at what one person in control can do to a free nation! Well tell me what you think and speak truley and be all you can be! ~!~TOUCAN~!~
~!~+~!~ToUcAn-SaM~!~+~!~
|
Registered: March 13, 2002
Posts: 3477
|
You do realize that Bush is not "In Command" and we still have two other branches of government, plus state and local governments to check his power? What sort of system do you propose otherwise? Or do you support more states rights? We fought a civil war about that one, guess who won? 
"Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?"
|
Registered: November 29, 2003
Posts: 1910
|
Would you prefer a triumvirate? A monarchy, perhaps? This is what we have checks and balances for. Supposedly. Bushism of the day: "One of the most meaningful things that's happened to me since I've been the governor — the president — governor — president. Oops. Ex-governor. I went to Bethesda Naval Hospital to give a fellow a Purple Heart, and at the same moment I watched him—get a Purple Heart for action in Iraq — and at that same — right after I gave him the Purple Heart, he was sworn in as a citizen of the United States — a Mexican citizen, now a United States citizen." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 9, 2004
"If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated," p.60, "1984," by George Orwell
|
Topics 
