Question:
Is he guilty?

Choices:
YES
NO

 

What?

I believe Michael Jackson in guilty,because of his past problem.Think about he paid the first two off they would keep theere mouth shut.He thougth his problems would go away. What a crazy man to believe that!!!! This is crazy to have boys in his bed what he thinking on. Then there was the maid that he was in the shower with another boy with nothing on.Did you here him giveing head that is what his bodyguard said that is what he was to another boy. Maybe we need to lock him up for one and maybe we will get the turth out of him.This men is sick,if is gay just say it I don't his will think less of him.Besides I think most of us belive it.

You have to remember, the Crocodile Hunter dude did that to his little kid. Dangled them over a lake full of alligators. That apparently raised cain in Australia. When my cousin was over their, if you even asked about Steve Irwin they just rolled their eyes. I don't know about Michael Jackson. It would've been fun to be on the jury, though. Just so I could really know what happened.

I actually think he is guilty. He obviously has something wrong with him. What about the baby dangling incident?! That's enough right there for me to believe he's got a mental disorder. He made a comment before saying "If they tell me that I can't be around children anymore, I'll kill myself!" That just sounds a little suspicious to me.

And rightly so, I dont think the man is a criminal, just frickin weird.. people dont like weird, they think that weird=gay, and gay = child molester... it's a bunch of really nasty steriotypes... granted MJ doesn't really help his case much.

Just so you guys know...the verdict rendered him innocent on all 10 counts of child molestation...

quote:

Originally posted by panterayall:

quote:

Originally posted by thicke:
I say he's not guilty, people just want him to be. Most people on this page give no reasoning, just say he is a sick weirdo freak. He had a rough childhood that kept him from growing up (in his mind), and unless you normally see 12 year old boys molesting eachother, there is no proof to justify his actions as anything other than childish, harmless, nothingness. The people accusing him are golddiggers after his fortune. Who wouldnt jump after this mysterious rich man if they had the chance? And to disgrace his name? Who wouldnt?

dont give me that he had a troubled childhood BS. He slept with the boys, is that not evidence enough. what kind of man invites little boys over to his mansion and sleeps with them, even if they didnt do anything sexual (which i doubt).

Who made those boys stay over? It is a perfectly public park, and who but these childrens' parents told these boys to go into his house? Even then, who allowed them to go but their parents? If anyone is to blame for this proposed child molestation, its the kids parents for allowing their children to be alone with Micheal overnight in the first place, even though the set precedented idea is that he is a child molester. Knowing this, (that he is a rumored child molester), the parents still repeatedly allowed their youngsters to play at Micheals home. Who is suing Micheal? The parents. Golddigging, money hungry, lying parents who are doing the simple thing of taking advantage of Micheal and his situation.

Thank you so much clpo13

There is nothing illegal about inviting people over to your house. Sexual relations though, are indeed illegal. But seeing as there is no evidence for the latter, he is innocent. Thicke's got the situation scoped out perfectly.

quote:

Originally posted by thicke:
I say he's not guilty, people just want him to be. Most people on this page give no reasoning, just say he is a sick weirdo freak. He had a rough childhood that kept him from growing up (in his mind), and unless you normally see 12 year old boys molesting eachother, there is no proof to justify his actions as anything other than childish, harmless, nothingness. The people accusing him are golddiggers after his fortune. Who wouldnt jump after this mysterious rich man if they had the chance? And to disgrace his name? Who wouldnt?

dont give me that he had a troubled childhood BS. He slept with the boys, is that not evidence enough. what kind of man invites little boys over to his mansion and sleeps with them, even if they didnt do anything sexual (which i doubt).

I say he's not guilty, people just want him to be. Most people on this page give no reasoning, just say he is a sick weirdo freak. He had a rough childhood that kept him from growing up (in his mind), and unless you normally see 12 year old boys molesting eachother, there is no proof to justify his actions as anything other than childish, harmless, nothingness. The people accusing him are golddiggers after his fortune. Who wouldnt jump after this mysterious rich man if they had the chance? And to disgrace his name? Who wouldnt?

He is one sick weirdo.

I think he's guilty because of his actions, not his appearance.

Pro-pedophilia.

Against child molesting.

quote:

I was more commenting on how everyone seems to be predisposed to calling him guilty even though they don't have the evidence. I personally will believe his innocence until solid evidence has been put forward against him. So far, none has. Thus, he is innocent.

I know that, but I was pointing out that most people say he's guilty until proven otherwise. Like, many people I know just think he's guilty just because he looks like a child molester.

I was more commenting on how everyone seems to be predisposed to calling him guilty even though they don't have the evidence. I personally will believe his innocence until solid evidence has been put forward against him. So far, none has. Thus, he is innocent.

quote:

*sighs* Guilty until proven guiltier, it seems. I refuse to call Michael Jackson anything aside from a helluva dancer until his guilt or lack of it been proven to me.

Has anyone ever noticed it's more like guilty until proven innocent? I mean, the trial isn't over and everyone says Michael did it.

Though I personally think he did do it but that's just because I think he's one sick *** mother ****er.

Wow, wonder how the reactions will be when my article is posted... cool

*sighs* Guilty until proven guiltier, it seems. I refuse to call Michael Jackson anything aside from a helluva dancer until his guilt or lack of it been proven to me.

Some perv like Michael Jackson just moved into my town and was seen by my high school.

Some girls went on a hunt two Tuesdays ago.